Bob Evenson's Land of the Free

chaz wyman · **Joined:** Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:31 pm **Posts:** 10592

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/08/nyreg ... itual.html

"http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/08/nyregion/infants-death-renews-debate-over-a-circumcision-ritual.html"

It's this crap forum that clips the link

This is not the orignal, but its about the same story.

Rabbis are allowed to suck baby cock in the US due to religious freedom

chaz wyman · **Joined:** Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:31 pm **Posts:** 10592

Kayla wrote:

chaz wyman wrote:

Just for Bob whose Provider does not like anti-religion facts being shared.
Is your ISP Jewish?

there is no censorship going on

you posted an incomplete url:

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/08/nyreg

no need to blame the jews

Have you heard of a joke?

chaz wyman · **Joined:** Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:31 pm **Posts:** 10592

Olympic ceremony censored by the US.

Of all the things you might expect to be censored I would have thought that the Olympic ceremony would have been the last; a ceremony emphasising respect, love and the unity of humanity.
But NBC thought otherwise, and took particular exception to the topic of love.

It is with some pride I think that Star Trek TOS had the first interracial kiss, between Kirk and Uhuru- this did receive a certain amount of censorship in the US, and some stations still hold a ban on that particular episode I am given to understand.

In a similar way the UK gave us the first example on world television of a Lesbian kiss, curtesy of "Brookside". During the Olympic display, during the montage of events and historical happening of the 20thC projected against the House in the middle of the stadium, this kiss appeared from a fleeting sub 2seconds. It is a triumph, although a minor one that this image was broadcast into millions of homes throughout the world, even Saudi-Arabia had this beamed directly into their homes.
But obviously this was too progressive, shocking or evil for the free-est country on earth; NBC managed to edit it out to save the shame and horror of their delicate viewers.

bobevenson · **Joined:** Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am **Posts:** 4260

chaz wyman wrote:

Olympic ceremony censored by the US.

Of all the things you might expect to be censored I would have thought that the Olympic ceremony would have been the last; a ceremony emphasising respect, love and the unity of humanity.
But NBC thought otherwise, and took particular exception to the topic of love.

It is with some pride I think that Star Trek TOS had the first interracial kiss, between Kirk and Uhuru- this did receive a certain amount of censorship in the US, and some stations still hold a ban on that particular episode I am given to understand.

In a similar way the UK gave us the first example on world television of a Lesbian kiss, curtesy of "Brookside". During the Olympic display, during the montage of events and historical happening of the 20thC projected against the House in the middle of the stadium, this kiss appeared from a fleeting sub 2seconds. It is a triumph, although a minor one that this image was broadcast into millions of homes throughout the world, even Saudi-Arabia had this beamed directly into their homes.
But obviously this was too progressive, shocking or evil for the free-est country on earth; NBC managed to edit it out to save the shame and horror of their delicate viewers.

As usual, you demonstrate your profound moronity by confusing NBC with the US.

chaz wyman · **Joined:** Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:31 pm **Posts:** 10592

bobevenson wrote:

chaz wyman wrote:

Olympic ceremony censored by the US.

Of all the things you might expect to be censored I would have thought that the Olympic ceremony would have been the last; a ceremony emphasising respect, love and the unity of humanity.
But NBC thought otherwise, and took particular exception to the topic of love.

It is with some pride I think that Star Trek TOS had the first interracial kiss, between Kirk and Uhuru- this did receive a certain amount of censorship in the US, and some stations still hold a ban on that particular episode I am given to understand.

In a similar way the UK gave us the first example on world television of a Lesbian kiss, curtesy of "Brookside". During the Olympic display, during the montage of events and historical happening of the 20thC projected against the House in the middle of the stadium, this kiss appeared from a fleeting sub 2seconds. It is a triumph, although a minor one that this image was broadcast into millions of homes throughout the world, even Saudi-Arabia had this beamed directly into their homes.
But obviously this was too progressive, shocking or evil for the free-est country on earth; NBC managed to edit it out to save the shame and horror of their delicate viewers.

As usual, you demonstrate your profound moronity by confusing NBC with the US.

The most profound form of censorship is the voluntary kind.

bobevenson · **Joined:** Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am **Posts:** 4260

chaz wyman wrote:

The most profound form of censorship is the voluntary kind.

Why do you equate NBC with the US? NBC is a private corporation, and is free to broadcast or not broadcast what they want within the guidelines of the FCC (now there's a government agency involved in censorship, you mindless monkey, or maybe dumb baboon).

chaz wyman · **Joined:** Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:31 pm **Posts:** 10592

bobevenson wrote:

chaz wyman wrote:

The most profound form of censorship is the voluntary kind.

Why do you equate NBC with the US? NBC is a private corporation, and is free to broadcast or not broadcast what they want within the guidelines of the FCC (now there's a government agency involved in censorship, you mindless monkey, or maybe dumb baboon).

The most profound form of censorship is the voluntary kind.

bobevenson · **Joined:** Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am **Posts:** 4260

chaz wyman wrote:

bobevenson wrote:

chaz wyman wrote:

The most profound form of censorship is the voluntary kind.

Why do you equate NBC with the US? NBC is a private corporation, and is free to broadcast or not broadcast what they want within the guidelines of the FCC (now there's a government agency involved in censorship, you mindless monkey, or maybe dumb baboon).

The most profound form of censorship is the voluntary kind.

Whatever the fuck that means!

John · **Posted:** Mon Jul 30, 2012 11:07 am

bobevenson wrote:

As usual, you demonstrate your profound moronity by confusing NBC with the US.

Says the guy who did the same with a French cinema and France.

Arising_uk · **Joined:** Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am **Posts:** 10543

chaz wyman wrote:

The most profound form of censorship is the voluntary kind.

How rich!

bobevenson · **Joined:** Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am **Posts:** 4260

John wrote:

bobevenson wrote:

As usual, you demonstrate your profound moronity by confusing NBC with the US.

Says the guy who did the same with a French cinema and France.

Look, bloke, the man was talking about government censorship and the land of the free. There's more damn censorship in Europe than you can shake a stick at. You almost have to get permission to fart.

chaz wyman · **Joined:** Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:31 pm **Posts:** 10592

John wrote:

bobevenson wrote:

As usual, you demonstrate your profound moronity by confusing NBC with the US.

Says the guy who did the same with a French cinema and France.

And the UK with Europe

chaz wyman · **Joined:** Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:31 pm **Posts:** 10592

bobevenson wrote:

John wrote:

bobevenson wrote:

As usual, you demonstrate your profound moronity by confusing NBC with the US.

Says the guy who did the same with a French cinema and France.

Look, bloke, the man was talking about government censorship and the land of the free. There's more damn censorship in Europe than you can shake a stick at. You almost have to get permission to fart.

There is no censorship in the UK.

Please furnish evidence

bobevenson · **Joined:** Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am **Posts:** 4260

chaz wyman wrote:

There is no censorship in the UK. Please furnish evidence

Achtung, is this good enough for you???

Censorship in the United Kingdom
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Censorship in the United Kingdom has a long history with variously stringent and lax laws in place at different times. Censorship of motion pictures, video games and Internet sites hosted in the United Kingdom are considered to be among the strictest in the European Union with the strictest being Germany.

chaz wyman · **Joined:** Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:31 pm **Posts:** 10592

bobevenson wrote:

chaz wyman wrote:

There is no censorship in the UK. Please furnish evidence

Achtung, is this good enough for you???

Censorship in the United Kingdom
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Censorship in the United Kingdom has a long history with variously stringent and lax laws in place at different times. Censorship of motion pictures, video games and Internet sites hosted in the United Kingdom are considered to be among the strictest in the European Union with the strictest being Germany.

That is in cinema, not the "UK."

Nothing different from any country in the Western World.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motion_Pic ... ing_system

Philosophy Now Forum

Bob Evenson's Land of the Free

Who is online