David Bowie is not a case for talking about brain surgery

Latest news of Philosophy Now

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Post Reply
User avatar
Hobbes' Choice
Posts: 8006
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am

David Bowie is not a case for talking about brain surgery

Post by Hobbes' Choice » Wed Feb 01, 2017 10:29 am

https://philosophynow.org/issues/118/Wi ... e_stand_up

I found this article very disappointing. It's based on a thought experiment about in impossible brain surgery; and talks about the outcomes which are naturally unknowable.
It using this to talk about a completely different type of identity question; that of David Bowie's dramatic creation of his on stage characters.

User avatar
Harbal
Posts: 2854
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2013 10:03 pm
Location: Yorkshire
Contact:

Re: David Bowie is not a case for talking about brain surgery

Post by Harbal » Wed Feb 01, 2017 9:21 pm

Hobbes' Choice wrote:https://philosophynow.org/issues/118/Wi ... e_stand_up

I found this article very disappointing. It's based on a thought experiment about in impossible brain surgery; and talks about the outcomes which are naturally unknowable.
It using this to talk about a completely different type of identity question; that of David Bowie's dramatic creation of his on stage characters.
A completely pointless article. As far as I can see, the incorporation of David Bowie is just an attempt to make what would have otherwise been a mind numbing piece of writing interesting.

User avatar
Hobbes' Choice
Posts: 8006
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am

Re: David Bowie is not a case for talking about brain surgery

Post by Hobbes' Choice » Thu Feb 02, 2017 12:02 am

Harbal wrote:
Hobbes' Choice wrote:https://philosophynow.org/issues/118/Wi ... e_stand_up

I found this article very disappointing. It's based on a thought experiment about in impossible brain surgery; and talks about the outcomes which are naturally unknowable.
It using this to talk about a completely different type of identity question; that of David Bowie's dramatic creation of his on stage characters.
A completely pointless article. As far as I can see, the incorporation of David Bowie is just an attempt to make what would have otherwise been a mind numbing piece of writing interesting.
I think you have the nail on the head.

User avatar
TSBU
Posts: 826
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2016 5:46 pm

Post by TSBU » Thu Feb 02, 2017 10:05 am

Image

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest