In case you did not realise it, the case for panpsychism does not rest on the observational evidence of a correlation between rocks and consciousness.
No, I realise that is rests on nothing - that is the whole point.
It seems to rest on the falsehood, expressed by you that the brain is 'incapable' of consciousness which is palpably incorrect.
I said no such thing, but as you are simply arguing against claims I never made and simply ignore my attempts to clarify, it seems pointless to make any further attempt to do so.
I agree. It seems to have escaped your attention - I have been saying that for some time that whilst you continue to ignore the basic evidence, and present none of your own you are just blowing it out of your nethers.