No, are you? The point is, that for you to stoop to such childish tactics as demeaning labeling, as with name calling and such, you assert that you are clearly correct, universally speaking, otherwise how could one say such things with certainty?
Let's just unpack this statement from a man who has just accused me of thinking myself God.
You will see that you are doing what you claim that I am doing.
You are claiming I am universally correct. I am not making that claim, no. That is what you do, and continue to do.
Incorrect, not only are you misquoting me, but you missed an extremely important contextual reference. I'm saying that you are claiming as such as evidenced by the 'absurd' lengths that you go.
The simple fact is that in our tiny human world certainty does not entail the 'universal'.
Never said that it does!
I cannot know if there is another species that has a handle on truth, but I am certain that when you clim to know the universal and absolute truth what you are ACTUALLY doing is claiming a thing to be true from your personal perspective.
First, that is incorrect because there is not one absolute or universal truth, but there are potentially a googolplex to the googolplex to the googolplex, etc, absolute and universal truths. Second your assertion that the human animal is incapable of surpassing it's own personal perspective, for a universal one is incorrect. Many that we have come to know, started out that way, but many are no longer, and are universal in scope.
Unless you are a God, you simply cannot make this claim.
All your truth like statements are actually a demonstration of a relationship you have with an object of your interest. That is inescapable.
Each time you make a true utterance, what you are in effect doing is saying 'this subject believes X".
You are confusing truth with belief. I'm not saying that many don't try and sell their beliefs as truth, because they believe them to be so, but the fact that this is done, does not negate any particular humans knowledge of an actual universal/absolute truth.
Such statement have no universal or absolute standing, nor can they.
It depends upon the particular statement.
The universe is no interested. In literal and metaphorical terms there is not interest, in the way of a conceiver, or interest in the way of a fact gathering entity.
First this is conjecture on your part, as you are in 'fact' doing the exact same thing that you 'believe' I'm doing. Based upon your miniscule powers of human perception, you 'believe,' this particular, is of 'truth,' and say as much. Yet, I'm not saying anything to the contrary, but indeed this is what you 'believe,' I am meaning. I am not saying the universe is an entity, because in this time one could never know this, but I am speaking of a universal perspective, where one detaches themselves from themselves, so as to see themselves amongst everything else contained within the universe, which includes what we believe we have come to know, of the truth of the universe, at this particular time.
Were the universe conscious, if it were to have an interest, then we might say that such things as universal truths exist.
You cannot possible 'know' that this is not true.
They could exist in the mind of god and be self interested. But you are just a speck in the infinitude of the universe, with your petty interests that die when you die.
So too with me and my statements
It looks like you are finally starting to get it, that you are not a god, notice how at first you speak as if it's only me, to which your words apply, as initially you say 'you' and 'your'. Then as an afterthought, the acknowledgement that we are the same, equal, as humans, finally sinks in, and you add "So too with me and my statements." Maybe there's hope for you yet.
Only a god could know the absolute truth of everything, moment to moment, such that they could know of the truth of this slanderous labeling you supply.
So, why is it you keep making claims of this nature?
As you can see you are doing what you falsely accuse me of doing.
You cannot see that this is different? I have never made claims that either of us "know the absolute truth of everything, moment to moment," as I say only a god could do that. This is merely a statement that excludes you as being correct in your treatment of others.
You then clearly must think you are a god, or else you would curb such things, with the knowledge that you, like your opponent, are merely mortal, and thus subject to error, possibly lost in this limited text based forum, of one attempting to convey, what it is that they see, as the possibilities, as only flawed human mortals are capable.
I think you are now talking to yourself.
Then you must be insane or have Alzheimer's, as around here everyone knows that you are the king of needless defamation of character or abilities. Though I have to admit, I have noticed that you have slightly improved and become more civil lately. So I commend you on your effort. You're becoming more believable and respectable every day.
I do not see, within your words, the humility, that only being a mere human affords. Which is, at least, curbing your unfounded childish outbursts.
But this is exactly what I claim , and you fail to again and again.
If you read through this carefully without rancour, you will see why I think you insane to make such comments.
Then you are blinded by self or quite possibly a victim of the insanity that you try and project upon me and others. Have you been checked recently, to see if your cancer is still in remission and hasn't spread to your brain? Seriously, You now have me worried about you.