Relativity, Negation and Atomism

So what's really going on?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Michael MD
Posts: 100
Joined: Mon May 11, 2015 4:12 pm

Re: Relativity, Negation and Atomism

Post by Michael MD »

The setting I was referring to as "first causal" would have been entirely different from ours in terms of phenomenologic behaviors. You can't legitimately apply our current "rules of physics" to "rule out" such concepts as first-causal oscillation, because the world existing at that time would have been "original" and free from any kind of forces, and oscillating point-localities could, in certain ways, have behaved differently than oscillatory systems observed in our world.

To give my ether model's description of Quantum Entanglement in more detail:

So-called quantum entanglement represents radiated packets of etheric energy which have the same vibratory pattern. Elemental etheric units are the only actual participants in this phenomenon, with the quantum units kinetically "walled off," like cool "arms" of a quiet, purring, ether mechanism.
Eodnhoj7
Posts: 8595
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:18 am

Re: Relativity, Negation and Atomism

Post by Eodnhoj7 »

Michael MD wrote: Fri Nov 17, 2017 2:24 pm The setting I was referring to as "first causal" would have been entirely different from ours in terms of phenomenologic behaviors.
Under the ether, the first cause would always be continually present in some degree.

You can't legitimately apply our current "rules of physics" to "rule out" such concepts as first-causal oscillation, because the world existing at that time would have been "original" and free from any kind of forces, and oscillating point-localities could, in certain ways, have behaved differently than oscillatory systems observed in our world.
I agree with your rules of physics point, however the point is a universal spatial structure that binds reality together into what it is. The "point" at the beginning the universel would be the same at the middle and end as an ever present median as 1 dimensional mirroring into itself. It would be the same in all other possible and potential universes.


To give my ether model's description of Quantum Entanglement in more detail:

So-called quantum entanglement represents radiated packets of etheric energy which have the same vibratory pattern. Elemental etheric units are the only actual participants in this phenomenon, with the quantum units kinetically "walled off," like cool "arms" of a quiet, purring, ether mechanism.

Quantum entanglement would be equivalent to 1 dimensional points reflecting -1 dimensional bonds between these 1 dimensional points as 0 dimensional points relating as 1n dimensional movement. Quantum entanglement observes the "connectiveness" of physical realities in response to an absence of structure. This absence of structure, observed through dark matter, is the foundation for relativity (and inevitably quantum mechanics) and in these respects only observes the relations of particles as "absences" of structure through movement.

Quantum Mechanics and Relativity is a Scientific Theory/Law whose foundations are founded on "negation". Ether cannot contain a vibratory state without first acknowledging it is made of Particulate as Vibrations require particle waves. If it is made of particulate, then it maintains "cracks" within its structure, it it maintains cracks (as vibrations), then it is not-unified therefore unstable.

The etheric structure can only be observed through a strict fusion of mathematics/geometry as it is a "whole". This would require a new field of mathematics and geometry, much in the same manner physicists develop new fields of math and geometry to observe phenomenon.

The apeiron, negation of the ether through movement, would observe the ether only as "the pockets" you are observing however these pockets in themselves are subject to change and are merely a relations as absences of structure. These pockets you are looking for, would in effect be structural "extensions" of the ether observed through the apeiron cycling through itself and temporarily canceling itself out through micro-cycles.

A structural extension of the ether, is not the ether in full and in this respect cannot be "proven", as what one is really watching is the Apeiron cycle itself out continually relative to the ether.
Post Reply