I asked for you to provide information about any science experiments regarding mind, you could not find any, which I already knew, there aren't any.Greta wrote:We appear destined to play a game of words that becomes increasingly abstracted and disconnected from the basic reality of being. If you feel that is a fruitful approach:A Human wrote:Yes, exactly, provide information about any scientific experiment where we can take any particular person and prove that person has a mind.Greta wrote: You've provided your opinion, one with which I disagree. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
There aren't any.
Mind. noun
1. (in a human or other conscious being) the element, part, substance, or process that reasons, thinks, feels, wills, perceives, judges, etc.: the processes of the human mind.
2. Psychology. the totality of conscious and unconscious mental processes and activities.
3. intellect or understanding, as distinguished from the faculties of feeling and willing; intelligence.
4. a particular instance of the intellect or intelligence, as in a person.
5. a person considered with reference to intellectual power: the greatest minds of the twentieth century.
6. intellectual power or ability.
7. reason, sanity, or sound mental condition: to lose one's mind.
Which of these do you accept or deny?
What is the broader point you wish to make by denying the existence of minds? People I've run into before who make such claims have either been trying to advocate for a stronger focus on the significance of the present moment or treating "mind" as an analog for "spirit" and using the denial as another plank in the well worn materialist v spiritualist debates.
Instead, you paste text from a dictionary since you have no proof, only words, not reality, to back your beliefs up.
Demonstrate repeatable experiments that prove your claims that anyone here can reproduce.
Or, paste more text instead.