Two people reading the same books or seeing the same movies or experiencing the same experiences, does not result in a common ground.
How one (re)acts to an event or a thought differs. Genetics factor in as well as the totality of all his other experiences.
One more thing...the diminishing of a personal insight, excusing one's self in the process, by claiming that all of it is common knowledge is a symptom of insecurity.
We might say that Einstein's insight into the nature of time was already around in fragments and he put his own twist on it.
Perhaps the connection between Communism and Christianity has been made, perhaps the common roots of Islam and Christianity in Judaism has been made, and the nihilistic undercurrents of Judaism have also been stated - most recently by Heisman - but as yet I have not come across anyone who connects it all to a general world trend based on shrinking spaces and population pressures, which selects the more feminine attributed in human nature.
What has not thoroughly been explored, except by such social pariahs as Heisman and Kaczynski in a very brief way, is the connection of modern liberalism and progressiveness with both communism and Christianity.
Even such movement as the Venus Project
hide their Communist ideals beneath semantics and technologies.
Is it coincidental that Marx and Jesus were Jews?
Is it coincidental that Spinoza, the man who adapted the Judeo-Christian God, into a secularizing world, was a Jew?
The anti-nature demeanor of Judaism is exemplified in the current denial of everything connected to nature and natural selection, We see it play out on forums like this, where liberals infected with the morals of slavishness refuse to even consider anything which even hints at what they call "sexism" and "racism" or superiority and inferiority.
The idea that man enters the world as anything more than a Lokean tabula rasa
, scares the shit out of them. The ideal that human potential is determined by nurturing, is the current mythology. People love it, because it dismisses their past and cleanses them from everything that is beyond their capacity to correct...like genetics.
The Judeo-Christian meme is attempting top usurp genetics and Natural Selection...turning it to the more malleable Social Selection.
We see it in the American dream - America being the culture of no culture.
I wrote a brief outline on this years ago, and I am currently revising it...The Feminization of Mankind
Heisman commented on how the Jews turned the world, the hierarchy of nature, on its head, making the meek the dominant ones and expressing in this way their anti-nature agenda. A different way of dominating masked in pseudo-altruism and humanitarianism. Suicide Note
And, by the way, Heisman is easily dismissed because he committed suicide, but the reasons he did so were based no intellectual integrity. being a Jew himself and having realized the effete and nihilistic foundations of his own people's philosophy, he correctly concluded that to follow through with the logic of his own kin he had to make himself one with the void....through death....and that a resistance to death was an anti-Jewish attitude, a masculine resistance, a reaffirmation of nature, which his people were contradicting.
What was not said was how this manifested itself pragmatically.
In politics what is currently considered "conservative" and what is called "progressive" imply states of being, or attitudes, contrary to their common ploys.
In conservatism we see a more masculine attitude which is the real radical element, and in liberalism we find the feminine attitude which is the true conservative.
Why? How,, you might ask?
Remember what I said about reality.
If you accept reality as being fluid and entropy as being the arrow of time, as man experiences this fluidity...then the conservative is an ordering, in fact they represent more order, and often indulge in a looking back, trying to return an earlier tradition.
In reference to reality, then, they are a reactionary element...they resist entropy and they propose a radical reinvention of reality with their Ideal. This looking back is in fact a looking back to an earlier time of more order, as entropy is an increase in disorder.
Now, let us proceed.
Given this the "progressives" are exposed as conservatives, as their dogmas only wish to surrender man to entropy, to go with the flow of fragmentation, to tolerate....Their acceptance of entropy is a conservative proposition. It conserves the status quo
, offering no resistance, but only wishing to accelerate change.
Change always veering towards entropy.
Both attitudes offer a nihilistic end, but from a different psychological vantage point.
For the masculine spirit the absolute Something is the desirable goal. Here God becomes the ultimate representation of this absence.
For the feminine spirit the absolute Nothing is the desirable goal - emptiness, the uniformity of a total void.
With the masculine spirit effort is necessary, and so the male spirit is reactionary. To go against entropy one must swim up-stream, so to speak, towards an idealized point of total unity...in toher words towards a decreasing entropy.
With the feminine spirit no effort is required but only a total submission, a giving-in, an acceptance. the only effort required is the quelling of the instinctive drives for self-sustenance. Therefore the ego, representing this self which self-maintains, is anathema.
It promises a total absence of suffering because to give in decreases resistance and so decreases the suffering temporal attrition produces. In the void no consciousness is present and so no experiencing of existence.
Of course they then come up with clever twists to maintain consciousness in some self-contradictory form...just s with Christianity life is accessible in its most perfect, idealized, form, through dying.
One must die to live, and in the eastern traditions one must stop thinking, stop being conscious, to connect to a more perfect consciousness, a more profound state of being.
All these are part of human husbandry.
Adaptation happens when the organism interacts with its environment, and so it is logical to find that in an environment of huge human populations, managed by systems trying to harmonize them, that these spiritual dogmas would emerge and flourish out of necessity.
Nothing mystical about them.
They share the same general principles, not accidentally.
Why modern man worships love, at the cost of all his other emotions and drives, is understood in this context.