Philosophy Now Forum

By unlimited, I mean freedom without responsibility.

I don't as I only see it leading to harm and destruction. The only question that remains for me is how limited should freedom be?

PhilX

Freedom without (self-) responsibility ain't 'freedom', only 'license'.

freedom is a moral right of moral people. duty and responsibility, to self and others come along with it.

There should be no God authorities over people, that is not freedom, but taking license that is none justifiable.

So there is no such thing as unlimited freedom. Every man has limits, and limitations.

Philosophy Explorer wrote: ↑Wed Aug 02, 2017 12:03 pm By unlimited, I mean freedom without responsibility. I don't as I only see it leading to harm and destruction. The only question that remains for me is how limited should freedom be?

I believe in unlimited freedom in putting one's hands around your throat.

bobevenson wrote: ↑Mon Aug 07, 2017 1:30 pm

Philosophy Explorer wrote: ↑Wed Aug 02, 2017 12:03 pm By unlimited, I mean freedom without responsibility. I don't as I only see it leading to harm and destruction. The only question that remains for me is how limited should freedom be?

I believe in unlimited freedom in putting one's hands around your throat.

How can you do that when you're all wrapped up in your pink strait-jacket?

PhilX

bobevenson wrote: ↑Mon Aug 07, 2017 2:29 pm I'm not talking about myself, I'm talking about people in general.

Speak for yourself loser.

PhilX

bobevenson wrote: ↑Mon Aug 07, 2017 1:30 pm

Philosophy Explorer wrote: ↑Wed Aug 02, 2017 12:03 pm By unlimited, I mean freedom without responsibility. I don't as I only see it leading to harm and destruction. The only question that remains for me is how limited should freedom be?

I believe in unlimited freedom in putting one's hands around your throat.

You can't even choke your own chicken.

PhilX

bobevenson wrote: ↑Mon Aug 07, 2017 3:15 pm A chicken is somebody who drapes himself with the American flag.

PhilX