Still haven't figured out what an ad hominem fallacy is?
You don't realize -- I don't care what you say about me. I really don't. Even if it were all true, the ad hominem fallacy would show that it would not go a single step toward rationally disproving anything I said. So what could it possibly matter?
You really should read that link...
Ah. So now you've lost your Atheism?...not good...evil...evil God...sociopath...evil.
These are all moral terms, terms that refer to things AS IF morality existed and was a real thing. But you cannot believe that.
None of the above terms have any objective referent if we live in the world of Atheism. Nothing is "not good" or "evil," and there are no "sociopaths." There are only morally-indifferent choices made by different people.
But Atheists know they are lying. They don't want to live in an amoral world -- nobody can. So, like you are doing here, they borrow terms from a world in which there are objective moral values and facts: lying is wrong, sociopaths are abnormal, good is right, evil is wrong, and so on. But they've already denied these terms have any meaning whatsoever.
In the real world, we call that "irrational" or "logically inconsistent" if we're being nice; "hypocritical" if we are not pulling punches. But then, we can use those terms with objective meaning...no such luck for the Atheist.
Ask yourself why you cannot even write one message without invoking so many moral terms. If your Atheism was what you really believed and practiced, that is exactly what you would have to do.