Let us all poop in the bushes instead of in the water. The sea, our primary food source, will thank us.

How should society be organised, if at all?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

User avatar
Greatest I am
Posts: 2964
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 5:09 pm

Let us all poop in the bushes instead of in the water. The sea, our primary food source, will thank us.

Post by Greatest I am »

Let us all poop in the bushes instead of in the water. The sea, our primary food source, will thank us.

All human waste should be used to make arable land instead of killing our primary food and cooling source. The sea.

Funny as it may sound, the wold has been producing arable land from animal waste forever. We lose that benefit by pumping our human waste into the sea.

A sea that will cost us trillions and impoverish many in the next 25 years, as it rises and forces us to spend trillions on infrastructure.

Add in the trillions that the wars that famines create and you have a depression style of life. All in the next 25 odd years. Happy days?

And all of this happens as the world population increases to its estimated plateau of 10 billion people, who will need to burn even more fossil fuels and add even more to global weather carnage.

I think we all suffer from a case of collective insanity.

A good reversal of that would be a collective protecting of our primary food source and create more arable land to feed the hordes of bodies that we will have to sustain. Human food needs fertilizing and human waste makes a great fertilizer after it becomes arable land.

Let us all poop in the bushes instead of in the water. I mean pump our sewage onto land of course.

This links leads to a longer one that all should view.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dSjE8xw_-Dg

Regards
DL
bobevenson
Posts: 7349
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
Contact:

Re: Let us all poop in the bushes instead of in the water. The sea, our primary food source, will thank us.

Post by bobevenson »

You're a left-wing, liberal Democrat, right?
User avatar
Greatest I am
Posts: 2964
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 5:09 pm

Re: Let us all poop in the bushes instead of in the water. The sea, our primary food source, will thank us.

Post by Greatest I am »

bobevenson wrote: Sat May 20, 2017 8:17 pm You're a left-wing, liberal Democrat, right?
Why do you ask? Because I am not a right wing climate change denier like Trump?

Regards
DL
bobevenson
Posts: 7349
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
Contact:

Re: Let us all poop in the bushes instead of in the water. The sea, our primary food source, will thank us.

Post by bobevenson »

Environmentalists Are Dead Wrong
By Walter Williams
Published April 26, 2017

"Each year, Earth Day is accompanied by predictions of doom. Let's take a look at past predictions to determine just how much confidence we can have in today's environmentalists' predictions.

In 1970, when Earth Day was conceived, the late George Wald, a Nobel laureate biology professor at Harvard University, predicted, "Civilization will end within 15 or 30 years unless immediate action is taken against problems facing mankind." Also in 1970, Paul Ehrlich, a Stanford University biologist and best-selling author of "The Population Bomb," declared that the world's population would soon outstrip food supplies. In an article for The Progressive, he predicted, "The death rate will increase until at least 100-200 million people per year will be starving to death during the next ten years." He gave this warning in 1969 to Britain's Institute of Biology: "If I were a gambler, I would take even money that England will not exist in the year 2000." On the first Earth Day, Ehrlich warned, "In 10 years, all important animal life in the sea will be extinct." Despite such predictions, Ehrlich has won no fewer than 16 awards, including the 1990 Crafoord Prize, the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences' highest award.

In International Wildlife (July 1975), Nigel Calder warned, "The threat of a new ice age must now stand alongside nuclear war as a likely source of wholesale death and misery for mankind." In Science News (1975), C.C. Wallen of the World Meteorological Organization is reported as saying, "The cooling since 1940 has been large enough and consistent enough that it will not soon be reversed."

In 2000, climate researcher David Viner told The Independent, a British newspaper, that within "a few years," snowfall would become "a very rare and exciting event" in Britain. "Children just aren't going to know what snow is," he said. "Snowfalls are now just a thing of the past." In the following years, the U.K. saw some of its largest snowfalls and lowest temperatures since records started being kept in 1914.

In 1970, ecologist Kenneth Watt told a Swarthmore College audience: "The world has been chilling sharply for about 20 years. If present trends continue, the world will be about 4 degrees colder for the global mean temperature in 1990 but 11 degrees colder in the year 2000. This is about twice what it would take to put us into an ice age."

Also in 1970, Sen. Gaylord Nelson wrote in Look magazine: "Dr. S. Dillon Ripley, secretary of the Smithsonian (Institution), believes that in 25 years, somewhere between 75 and 80 percent of all the species of living animals will be extinct."

Scientist Harrison Brown published a chart in Scientific American that year estimating that mankind would run out of copper shortly after 2000. Lead, zinc, tin, gold and silver were to disappear before 1990.

Erroneous predictions didn't start with Earth Day. In 1939, the U.S. Department of the Interior said American oil supplies would last for only another 13 years. In 1949, the secretary of the interior said the end of U.S. oil supplies was in sight. Having learned nothing from its earlier erroneous claims, in 1974 the U.S. Geological Survey said that the U.S. had only a 10-year supply of natural gas. The fact of the matter, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, is that as of 2014, we had 2.47 quadrillion cubic feet of natural gas, which should last about a century.

Hoodwinking Americans is part of the environmentalist agenda. Environmental activist Stephen Schneider told Discover magazine in 1989: "We have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements, and make little mention of any doubts we might have. ... Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest." In 1988, then-Sen. Timothy Wirth, D-Colo., said: "We've got to ... try to ride the global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong ... we will be doing the right thing anyway in terms of economic policy and environmental policy."

Americans have paid a steep price for buying into environmental deception and lies."


Dr. Walter Williams is an American economist, commentator, and academic. He is the John M. Olin Distinguished Professor of Economics at George Mason University, as well as a syndicated columnist and author known for his libertarian views.
User avatar
Greatest I am
Posts: 2964
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 5:09 pm

Re: Let us all poop in the bushes instead of in the water. The sea, our primary food source, will thank us.

Post by Greatest I am »

The U.N. and 99% of all environmental scientists disagree with you.

Regards
D
bobevenson
Posts: 7349
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
Contact:

Re: Let us all poop in the bushes instead of in the water. The sea, our primary food source, will thank us.

Post by bobevenson »

Do they disagree with the facts Williams presented?
User avatar
Harbal
Posts: 9557
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2013 10:03 pm
Location: Yorkshire
Contact:

Re: Let us all poop in the bushes instead of in the water. The sea, our primary food source, will thank us.

Post by Harbal »

bobevenson wrote: Sat May 20, 2017 10:12 pm Do they disagree with the facts Williams presented?
Is blue text more factually reliable than black?
bobevenson
Posts: 7349
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
Contact:

Re: Let us all poop in the bushes instead of in the water. The sea, our primary food source, will thank us.

Post by bobevenson »

Harbal wrote: Sat May 20, 2017 10:27 pm
bobevenson wrote: Sat May 20, 2017 10:12 pm Do they disagree with the facts Williams presented?
Is blue text more factually reliable than black?
Please, you should know that I always use blue text when quoting somebody directly. Got any comments on the thread itself?
User avatar
Harbal
Posts: 9557
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2013 10:03 pm
Location: Yorkshire
Contact:

Re: Let us all poop in the bushes instead of in the water. The sea, our primary food source, will thank us.

Post by Harbal »

bobevenson wrote: Sat May 20, 2017 10:35 pm Please, you should know that I always use blue text when quoting somebody directly. Got any comments on the thread itself?
I'm not well enough informed to talk about specifics but you don't need to be a scientist to be able to work out that if you dump crap into the sea and pump toxic fumes into the atmosphere there are going to be negative consequences.
User avatar
Greatest I am
Posts: 2964
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 5:09 pm

Re: Let us all poop in the bushes instead of in the water. The sea, our primary food source, will thank us.

Post by Greatest I am »

bobevenson wrote: Sat May 20, 2017 10:12 pm Do they disagree with the facts Williams presented?
Do you deny what is said in Cowspiracy?

Regards
DL
User avatar
vegetariantaxidermy
Posts: 13983
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
Location: Narniabiznus

Re: Let us all poop in the bushes instead of in the water. The sea, our primary food source, will thank us.

Post by vegetariantaxidermy »

Greatest I am wrote: Sat May 20, 2017 8:21 pm
bobevenson wrote: Sat May 20, 2017 8:17 pm You're a left-wing, liberal Democrat, right?
Why do you ask? Because I am not a right wing climate change denier like Trump?

Regards
DL
Of course. Because EVERYTHING is about political agenda. Global warming doesn't sit with Boob's agenda, therefore it's not happening.
Ginkgo
Posts: 2657
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2012 2:47 pm

Re: Let us all poop in the bushes instead of in the water. The sea, our primary food source, will thank us.

Post by Ginkgo »

bobevenson wrote: Sat May 20, 2017 9:05 pm Environmentalists Are Dead Wrong
By Walter Williams
Published April 26, 2017

"Each year, Earth Day is accompanied by predictions of doom. Let's take a look at past predictions to determine just how much confidence we can have in today's environmentalists' predictions.


If Williams were a scientist he would know that past predictions having nothing to do with future predictions.
User avatar
Greatest I am
Posts: 2964
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 5:09 pm

Re: Let us all poop in the bushes instead of in the water. The sea, our primary food source, will thank us.

Post by Greatest I am »

vegetariantaxidermy wrote: Sun May 21, 2017 12:26 am
Greatest I am wrote: Sat May 20, 2017 8:21 pm
bobevenson wrote: Sat May 20, 2017 8:17 pm You're a left-wing, liberal Democrat, right?
Why do you ask? Because I am not a right wing climate change denier like Trump?

Regards
DL
Of course. Because EVERYTHING is about political agenda. Global warming doesn't sit with Boob's agenda, therefore it's not happening.
It rather strange that he would associate my political stripe with what I believe.

It does sound like he would ignore facts just because his political stripe is against it.

That is analogues to Christian who follow a genocidal son murdering God just because it is a Christian God, while ignoring the immorality of that God.

That kind of dead mindedness reminds me of a line in this link that indicates that many follow a God, regardless of the satanic morals of that God, just because they think he is on their side.

This is worth the watching.

https://vimeo.com/7038401

Regards
DL
User avatar
vegetariantaxidermy
Posts: 13983
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
Location: Narniabiznus

Re: Let us all poop in the bushes instead of in the water. The sea, our primary food source, will thank us.

Post by vegetariantaxidermy »

Greatest I am wrote: Sun May 21, 2017 3:02 pm
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: Sun May 21, 2017 12:26 am
Greatest I am wrote: Sat May 20, 2017 8:21 pm

Why do you ask? Because I am not a right wing climate change denier like Trump?

Regards
DL
Of course. Because EVERYTHING is about political agenda. Global warming doesn't sit with Boob's agenda, therefore it's not happening.
It rather strange that he would associate my political stripe with what I believe.

It does sound like he would ignore facts just because his political stripe is against it.

That is analogues to Christian who follow a genocidal son murdering God just because it is a Christian God, while ignoring the immorality of that God.

That kind of dead mindedness reminds me of a line in this link that indicates that many follow a God, regardless of the satanic morals of that God, just because they think he is on their side.

This is worth the watching.

https://vimeo.com/7038401

Regards
DL
It looks like a good film. They seem to be English actors.
Tbieter posted a good but ignored thread about the way everything today seems to be politicised, with 'facts' depending on what your political persuasion is. You see that on here all the time, with one example being the way in which the likes of bob and co. deny global warming just because it doesn't suit their political agenda. I find that really weird. Facts are facts and evidence is evidence. Those things don't give a damn about politics.
User avatar
Greatest I am
Posts: 2964
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 5:09 pm

Re: Let us all poop in the bushes instead of in the water. The sea, our primary food source, will thank us.

Post by Greatest I am »

vegetariantaxidermy wrote: Sun May 21, 2017 4:28 pm
Greatest I am wrote: Sun May 21, 2017 3:02 pm
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: Sun May 21, 2017 12:26 am

Of course. Because EVERYTHING is about political agenda. Global warming doesn't sit with Boob's agenda, therefore it's not happening.
It rather strange that he would associate my political stripe with what I believe.

It does sound like he would ignore facts just because his political stripe is against it.

That is analogues to Christian who follow a genocidal son murdering God just because it is a Christian God, while ignoring the immorality of that God.

That kind of dead mindedness reminds me of a line in this link that indicates that many follow a God, regardless of the satanic morals of that God, just because they think he is on their side.

This is worth the watching.

https://vimeo.com/7038401

Regards
DL
It looks like a good film. They seem to be English actors.
Tbieter posted a good but ignored thread about the way everything today seems to be politicised, with 'facts' depending on what your political persuasion is. You see that on here all the time, with one example being the way in which the likes of bob and co. deny global warming just because it doesn't suit their political agenda. I find that really weird. Facts are facts and evidence is evidence. Those things don't give a damn about politics.
Indeed.

Be it idol worshiping Christians and Muslims, or Republicans or Democrats that idolize their political masters or party, all idol worshipers ignore logic and reason to maintain their tribal ties.

What a waste of good minds. They all deserve the adjective that this link ends with.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TjxZ6Mr ... re=related

Regards
DL
Post Reply