Show me where it says in the U.S. Constitution...

[bobevenson]

...that American tax money should be spent to do good or meddle in the affairs of other countries.

Show me where in the constitution is says you are an idiot. It does not, and yet it is still true.

Please, you and your British brethren don't even have a fucking constitution, so don't bother commenting on somebody who does!

[Philosophy Explorer]

...that American tax money should be spent to do good or meddle in the affairs of other countries.

Show me where in the constitution is says you are an idiot. It does not, and yet it is still true.

Please, you and your British brethren don't even have a fucking constitution, so don't bother commenting on somebody who does!

Bob, you keep forgetting this is a British website so they have a perfect right to comment.

PhilX

[bobevenson]

Fools have a right to comment, but they should keep their thoughts to themselves.

[Philosophy Explorer]

Fools have a right to comment, but they shouldn't.

Stop looking at that mirror Bob.

PhilX

[bobevenson]

You know, you're dumber than Hobbes, which is quite an achievement!

[Philosophy Explorer]

You know, you're dumber than Hobbes, which is quite an achievement!

I'm thankful for small favors.

PhilX

[bobevenson]

I guess that proves my point, huh?

[Philosophy Explorer]

I guess that proves my point, huh?

It might.

PhilX

[vegetariantaxidermy]

You old mass murderer. You love to let the guilty Syrians off the hook. You have no sense of justice in your little twisted mind. Add on you're the real senile piece of shit,
And now you're accusing the US of poisoning those children. You demented witch.

PhilX

There's just as much evidence that the US did it as Assad, in fact there is more, since the US has a motive while Assad has none. Arguing is wasted energy on you. You are so fucking stupid I don't know how you even manage to turn on your computer. You are a war-loving moron. Why do you love war so much? Why do you have no empathy? You don't seriously expect anyone to believe that a psychopathic war-lover like you gives two hoots about anyone but himself. Well it looks as if WW111, your ultimate wet dream, isn't far off. The only consolation is that all yanks including your loved ones (in the extremely remote likelihood that you have any) will suffer as much as everyone else.

You are so fucking stupid in your prejudicial hatred towards the US. The world is in disagreement with your viewpoints. So be specific, what is it that the US is supposed to have done? What is the US motive in using a chemical attack against the people, you stupid witch? Do you think about the things you say? You still stick up for the real culprits, the Syrians, who have been getting away with murder for years, you dummy. The international community is aware that Assad and his regime are the guilty party, mass murderer. What does war-loving have to do with this? None has been declared in Syria. The international community looks upon the US and the UK with favor. But talking with you is useless as you have a blockhead against reason.

PhilX

What is Assad's motive? Even if he was responsible, why do you think innocent Syrians should be punished? I've noticed that about the yank mind-set. Evidence isn't given a high priority. You are such a drone. The US did exactly the same thing with Iraq. Pretended it was to 'save' them from Saddam.
Didn't that teach you anything? Let me guess. You still believe that to be the case. What a surprise. Do you really think your country gives a flying fuck about the gassing victims? It doesn't give a shit about anyone. It's a corporation. An entity. It only cares about propaganda, duping morons like you, and keeping the arms industry happy.
Your 'reasoning' is to blow innocent people up because some innocent people were gassed. Wow. That makes a whole lot of sense.
Btw. How is asking for evidence 'sticking up' for anyone? Why aren't you 'sticking up' for the innocent who are being punished? Or do you think all Syrians must be guilty by default?

[Philosophy Explorer]

There's just as much evidence that the US did it as Assad, in fact there is more, since the US has a motive while Assad has none. Arguing is wasted energy on you. You are so fucking stupid I don't know how you even manage to turn on your computer. You are a war-loving moron. Why do you love war so much? Why do you have no empathy? You don't seriously expect anyone to believe that a psychopathic war-lover like you gives two hoots about anyone but himself. Well it looks as if WW111, your ultimate wet dream, isn't far off. The only consolation is that all yanks including your loved ones (in the extremely remote likelihood that you have any) will suffer as much as everyone else.

You are so fucking stupid in your prejudicial hatred towards the US. The world is in disagreement with your viewpoints. So be specific, what is it that the US is supposed to have done? What is the US motive in using a chemical attack against the people, you stupid witch? Do you think about the things you say? You still stick up for the real culprits, the Syrians, who have been getting away with murder for years, you dummy. The international community is aware that Assad and his regime are the guilty party, mass murderer. What does war-loving have to do with this? None has been declared in Syria. The international community looks upon the US and the UK with favor. But talking with you is useless as you have a blockhead against reason.

PhilX

What is Assad's motive? Even if he was responsible, why do you think innocent Syrians should be punished? I've noticed that about the yank mind-set. Evidence isn't given a high priority. You are such a drone. The US did exactly the same thing with Iraq. Pretended it was to 'save' them from Saddam.
Didn't that teach you anything? Let me guess. You still believe that to be the case. What a surprise. Do you really think your country gives a flying fuck about the gassing victims? It doesn't give a shit about anyone. It's a corporation. An entity. It only cares about propaganda, duping morons like you, and keeping the arms industry happy.
Your 'reasoning' is to blow innocent people up because some innocent people were gassed. Wow. That makes a whole lot of sense.

Talk about making sense. You just said that even if Assad were responsible, do I think that innocent Syrians should be punished which is exactly what Assad did. Makes a whole lot of sense, doesn't it in your blind hatred of the US? The rest of your garbage follows the same line of your prejudice.

PhilX

[vegetariantaxidermy]

You are so fucking stupid in your prejudicial hatred towards the US. The world is in disagreement with your viewpoints. So be specific, what is it that the US is supposed to have done? What is the US motive in using a chemical attack against the people, you stupid witch? Do you think about the things you say? You still stick up for the real culprits, the Syrians, who have been getting away with murder for years, you dummy. The international community is aware that Assad and his regime are the guilty party, mass murderer. What does war-loving have to do with this? None has been declared in Syria. The international community looks upon the US and the UK with favor. But talking with you is useless as you have a blockhead against reason.

PhilX

What is Assad's motive? Even if he was responsible, why do you think innocent Syrians should be punished? I've noticed that about the yank mind-set. Evidence isn't given a high priority. You are such a drone. The US did exactly the same thing with Iraq. Pretended it was to 'save' them from Saddam.
Didn't that teach you anything? Let me guess. You still believe that to be the case. What a surprise. Do you really think your country gives a flying fuck about the gassing victims? It doesn't give a shit about anyone. It's a corporation. An entity. It only cares about propaganda, duping morons like you, and keeping the arms industry happy.
Your 'reasoning' is to blow innocent people up because some innocent people were gassed. Wow. That makes a whole lot of sense.

Talk about making sense. You just said that even if Assad were responsible, do I think that innocent Syrians should be punished which is exactly what Assad did. Makes a whole lot of sense, doesn't it in your blind hatred of the US? The rest of your garbage follows the same line of your prejudice.

PhilX

Wtf are you talking about?? How is that not a perfectly simple question that only requires a perfectly simple answer?? I will ask it again. If Assad is found to be guilty, then why do you think all Syrians should have to pay?
And the fact that I detest your country has nothing to do with this. It wouldn't make any difference even if I liked it. I would still think the same way. Evidence and facts are neutral. That's clearly far too much for your barely functional 'brain' to handle. It's easy to see why we will never be free of war-- there are just too many morons with exactly the same mind-set as yours, with no capacity whatsoever for critical thinking.

[Philosophy Explorer]

What is Assad's motive? Even if he was responsible, why do you think innocent Syrians should be punished? I've noticed that about the yank mind-set. Evidence isn't given a high priority. You are such a drone. The US did exactly the same thing with Iraq. Pretended it was to 'save' them from Saddam.
Didn't that teach you anything? Let me guess. You still believe that to be the case. What a surprise. Do you really think your country gives a flying fuck about the gassing victims? It doesn't give a shit about anyone. It's a corporation. An entity. It only cares about propaganda, duping morons like you, and keeping the arms industry happy.
Your 'reasoning' is to blow innocent people up because some innocent people were gassed. Wow. That makes a whole lot of sense.

Talk about making sense. You just said that even if Assad were responsible, do I think that innocent Syrians should be punished which is exactly what Assad did. Makes a whole lot of sense, doesn't it in your blind hatred of the US? The rest of your garbage follows the same line of your prejudice.

PhilX

Wtf are you talking about?? How is that not a perfectly simple question that only requires a perfectly simple answer?? I will ask it again. If Assad is found to be guilty, then why do you think all Syrians should have to pay?
And the fact that I detest your country has nothing to do with this. It wouldn't make any difference even if I liked it. I would still think the same way. Evidence and facts are neutral. That's clearly far too much for your barely functional 'brain' to handle. It's easy to see why we will never be free of war-- there are just too many morons with exactly the same mind-set as yours, with no capacity whatsoever for critical thinking.

Yes, why do Syrians have to pay through Assad's chemical attack on them? Apparently VT doesn't give a shit; she only cares about her own agenda which is a vendetta against the US.

PhilX

[vegetariantaxidermy]

Talk about making sense. You just said that even if Assad were responsible, do I think that innocent Syrians should be punished which is exactly what Assad did. Makes a whole lot of sense, doesn't it in your blind hatred of the US? The rest of your garbage follows the same line of your prejudice.

PhilX

Wtf are you talking about?? How is that not a perfectly simple question that only requires a perfectly simple answer?? I will ask it again. If Assad is found to be guilty, then why do you think all Syrians should have to pay?
And the fact that I detest your country has nothing to do with this. It wouldn't make any difference even if I liked it. I would still think the same way. Evidence and facts are neutral. That's clearly far too much for your barely functional 'brain' to handle. It's easy to see why we will never be free of war-- there are just too many morons with exactly the same mind-set as yours, with no capacity whatsoever for critical thinking.

Yes, why do Syrians have to pay through Assad's chemical attack on them? Apparently VT doesn't give a shit; she only cares about her own agenda which is a vendetta against the US.

PhilX

That doesn't even make sense, and has no relevance to what I asked. So you don't even pretend to care about the guilty party being punished. How unexpected. Fuck, even when it's one of your own saying pretty much the same things I do, you dismiss it as 'he must have forgotten'.
Why don't you just go and deep fry your head? It might even improve your quality of thinking.

[Philosophy Explorer]

Wtf are you talking about?? How is that not a perfectly simple question that only requires a perfectly simple answer?? I will ask it again. If Assad is found to be guilty, then why do you think all Syrians should have to pay?
And the fact that I detest your country has nothing to do with this. It wouldn't make any difference even if I liked it. I would still think the same way. Evidence and facts are neutral. That's clearly far too much for your barely functional 'brain' to handle. It's easy to see why we will never be free of war-- there are just too many morons with exactly the same mind-set as yours, with no capacity whatsoever for critical thinking.

Yes, why do Syrians have to pay through Assad's chemical attack on them? Apparently VT doesn't give a shit; she only cares about her own agenda which is a vendetta against the US.

PhilX

That doesn't even make sense, and has no relevance to what I asked. So you don't even pretend to care about the guilty party being punished. How unexpected. Fuck, even when it's one of your own saying pretty much the same things I do, you dismiss it as 'he must have forgotten'.
Why don't you just go and deep fry your head? It might even improve your quality of thinking.

Of course it doesn't make sense to you. You're prejudiced.

PhilX

[vegetariantaxidermy]

Yes, why do Syrians have to pay through Assad's chemical attack on them? Apparently VT doesn't give a shit; she only cares about her own agenda which is a vendetta against the US.

PhilX

That doesn't even make sense, and has no relevance to what I asked. So you don't even pretend to care about the guilty party being punished. How unexpected. Fuck, even when it's one of your own saying pretty much the same things I do, you dismiss it as 'he must have forgotten'.
Why don't you just go and deep fry your head? It might even improve your quality of thinking.

Of course it doesn't make sense to you. You're prejudiced.

PhilX

It wouldn't make sense to anyone but a retarded insane person. PE quote: ''Assad killed innocent people. The only course of action is to kill more innocent people to punish him for killing innocent people''. That MUST make sense to you because you said it. Now why don't you run off and wank to some more of that war porn you have stacked up in your basement home.