.
You used the word destructive.
In The Landscape of This Third Industrial Revolution destruction is a necessary characteristic of this process.
A form of destruction must take place before any meaningful construction is possible.
That is coming. And perhaps for most, that is the cause of rightful concern, fear, and trepidation.
I choose to look at this process as exciting.
I am hopeful.
* Thank you for allowing me this special opportunity to clarify my position and to give comfort and reason to all of those active members and forum supporters.
.
~ Trumpland; The Landscape of Politics in the Third Industrial Revolution ~
- Bill Wiltrack
- Posts: 5468
- Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 1:52 pm
- Location: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Contact:
- FlashDangerpants
- Posts: 6335
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:54 pm
Re: ~ Trumpland; The Landscape of Politics in the Third Industrial Revolution ~
Bill dives for safety between the iron thighs of the dictator!
- Arising_uk
- Posts: 12314
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am
Re: ~ Trumpland; The Landscape of Politics in the Third Industrial Revolution ~
Except that your president-elect appears to have promised to reconstruct the previous industrial industries?Bill Wiltrack wrote:...
In The Landscape of This Third Industrial Revolution destruction is a necessary characteristic of this process.
A form of destruction must take place before any meaningful construction is possible.
.
He's also going to keep the new 'trickle-down' rich tax cuts, even tho' he hasn't paid any for quite a few years.
Last edited by Arising_uk on Sun Nov 13, 2016 10:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Arising_uk
- Posts: 12314
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am
Re: ~ Trumpland; The Landscape of Politics in the Third Industrial Revolution ~
Very true but what good is a 'philosopher' who tries to hide his past views?Bill Wiltrack wrote:...
To consciously change one's perspective is not a weakness.
What good is a mind if you cannot change it?
Re: ~ Trumpland; The Landscape of Politics in the Third Industrial Revolution ~
Hey Bill,
If you were wrong "then"... you're probably wrong "now", which you'll realize at some point in the future. Right??
So why would you claim yourself to be our leader, when you would be leading everyone down your own rambling and inaccurate and (to use your word) "shameful" path? Why do you need to put yourself in such a role? And why would you put other people at such risk?
Why not just accept who you are and have been... and who everyone else is and has been... rather than trying to deny or ignore it? And stop trying to position yourself on top? Might THAT actually be what keeps you scrambling?
If you were wrong "then"... you're probably wrong "now", which you'll realize at some point in the future. Right??
So why would you claim yourself to be our leader, when you would be leading everyone down your own rambling and inaccurate and (to use your word) "shameful" path? Why do you need to put yourself in such a role? And why would you put other people at such risk?
Why not just accept who you are and have been... and who everyone else is and has been... rather than trying to deny or ignore it? And stop trying to position yourself on top? Might THAT actually be what keeps you scrambling?