the absurdity of the american voter, americans, america, etc. and etc.

How should society be organised, if at all?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

User avatar
SpheresOfBalance
Posts: 5688
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 4:27 pm
Location: On a Star Dust Metamorphosis

Re: the absurdity of the american voter, americans, america, etc. and etc.

Post by SpheresOfBalance »

SpheresOfBalance wrote:
Dalek Prime wrote:
SpheresOfBalance wrote:
Is he advocating, or contrasting for your benefit?
How is child abuse beneficial for anyone? I'm an antinatalist because I don't want this rubbish done to young minds.
My comment went right over your head DP, is it any wonder? How is it child abuse to post pictures of people potentially abusing children? You don't even know "why" Bill posted those pics, to then say he's not fit to breed, is only a reflection of your own small mind, surely not his.
Wrong, He posted two pictures of two different people potentially harming children, Bill is one person, you said:
"Yet another person who has proven not fit to breed." That's singular not plural, DP! The way you wrote it it could only have been Bill you were referring too, numbskull!
;-)
User avatar
SpheresOfBalance
Posts: 5688
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 4:27 pm
Location: On a Star Dust Metamorphosis

Re: the absurdity of the american voter, americans, america, etc. and etc.

Post by SpheresOfBalance »

Terrapin Station wrote:
Dalek Prime wrote:
SpheresOfBalance wrote:
Is he advocating, or contrasting for your benefit?
How is child abuse beneficial for anyone? I'm an antinatalist because I don't want this rubbish done to young minds.
The one picture was of someone with a Playboy magazine open in front of a toddler.

You must be ridiculously conservative on this stuff.
This is meant for everyone:

Was it photoshopped, or green screened? Was their a piece of blank white paper hiding the magazines content, or was a playboy cover fixed to the outside of a comic book? Then again playboy is not filled with x-rated pornography, rather r-rated nudity. In fact what child hasn't accidentally seen their mother, father, or siblings of another sex naked? Is nakedness detrimental to a child's psychological development? Are all families that visit nudist camps harming their children? Since the TRUTH of our existence is that we are our bodies, not our cloths, what actual harm can be done by seeing the truth of things? If you believe that nudity is harmful to anyone, then Freud was right about, at least your type; nut job!
User avatar
SpheresOfBalance
Posts: 5688
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 4:27 pm
Location: On a Star Dust Metamorphosis

Re: the absurdity of the american voter, americans, america, etc. and etc.

Post by SpheresOfBalance »

America was born first and foremost with democracy in mind. To read and understand the Declaration of Independence, and the US Constitution points this out very clearly.

"We, the people of the United States"
Dalek Prime
Posts: 4922
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:48 am
Location: Living in a tree with Polly.

Re: the absurdity of the american voter, americans, america, etc. and etc.

Post by Dalek Prime »

SpheresOfBalance wrote:
SpheresOfBalance wrote:
Dalek Prime wrote: How is child abuse beneficial for anyone? I'm an antinatalist because I don't want this rubbish done to young minds.
My comment went right over your head DP, is it any wonder? How is it child abuse to post pictures of people potentially abusing children? You don't even know "why" Bill posted those pics, to then say he's not fit to breed, is only a reflection of your own small mind, surely not his.
Wrong, He posted two pictures of two different people potentially harming children, Bill is one person, you said:
"Yet another person who has proven not fit to breed." That's singular not plural, DP! The way you wrote it it could only have been Bill you were referring too, numbskull!
;-)
And yet it wasn't him, you foolish trash hole.
Dalek Prime
Posts: 4922
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:48 am
Location: Living in a tree with Polly.

Re: the absurdity of the american voter, americans, america, etc. and etc.

Post by Dalek Prime »

SpheresOfBalance wrote:
Terrapin Station wrote:
Dalek Prime wrote: How is child abuse beneficial for anyone? I'm an antinatalist because I don't want this rubbish done to young minds.
The one picture was of someone with a Playboy magazine open in front of a toddler.

You must be ridiculously conservative on this stuff.
This is meant for everyone:

Was it photoshopped, or green screened? Was their a piece of blank white paper hiding the magazines content, or was a playboy cover fixed to the outside of a comic book? Then again playboy is not filled with x-rated pornography, rather r-rated nudity. In fact what child hasn't accidentally seen their mother, father, or siblings of another sex naked? Is nakedness detrimental to a child's psychological development? Are all families that visit nudist camps harming their children? Since the TRUTH of our existence is that we are our bodies, not our cloths, what actual harm can be done by seeing the truth of things? If you believe that nudity is harmful to anyone, then Freud was right about, at least your type; nut job!
There are so many things an infant can witness, that are clearly much healthier for them. Hey, you want to look at porn with your kids, by all means, you will. But of all the beautiful, picturesque books in this world, you choose Playboy? Get real, ya dirtbag.
User avatar
Terrapin Station
Posts: 4548
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 7:18 pm
Location: NYC Man

Re: the absurdity of the american voter, americans, america, etc. and etc.

Post by Terrapin Station »

"Beautiful, nude women are not healthy"


oy vey
Dalek Prime
Posts: 4922
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:48 am
Location: Living in a tree with Polly.

Re: the absurdity of the american voter, americans, america, etc. and etc.

Post by Dalek Prime »

Terrapin Station wrote:"Beautiful, nude women are not healthy"


oy vey
Yeah, and infants don't have enough to read or look at, that Playboy should be ahead of them? Are you retards joking? If you really want kids to get used to the human form, walk around the house naked, or read a nice picture book together in the raw. Playboy doesn't need to be included.

And besides, isn't Playboy still for 18+? Where does that fit into your scheme? Fucking morons.
Last edited by Dalek Prime on Fri Oct 07, 2016 12:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Terrapin Station
Posts: 4548
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 7:18 pm
Location: NYC Man

Re: the absurdity of the american voter, americans, america, etc. and etc.

Post by Terrapin Station »

Dalek Prime wrote:
Terrapin Station wrote:"Beautiful, nude women are not healthy"


oy vey
Yeah, and infants don't have enough to read or look at, that Playboy should be ahead of them? Are you retards joking? If you really want kids to get used to the human form, walk around them house naked, or read a nice picture book together in the raw. Playboy doesn't need to be included.

And besides, isn't Playboy still for 18+? Where does that fit into your scheme? Fucking morons.
I'd love to meet some of you in person. I get these mental pictures of what people might look like and how they might come across in person that are probably completely different from reality.
Dalek Prime
Posts: 4922
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:48 am
Location: Living in a tree with Polly.

Re: the absurdity of the american voter, americans, america, etc. and etc.

Post by Dalek Prime »

Terrapin Station wrote:
Dalek Prime wrote:
Terrapin Station wrote:"Beautiful, nude women are not healthy"


oy vey
Yeah, and infants don't have enough to read or look at, that Playboy should be ahead of them? Are you retards joking? If you really want kids to get used to the human form, walk around the house naked, or read a nice picture book together in the raw. Playboy doesn't need to be included.

And besides, isn't Playboy still for 18+? Where does that fit into your scheme? Fucking morons.
I'd love to meet some of you in person. I get these mental pictures of what people might look like and how they might come across in person that are probably completely different from reality.
Meh. I've met enough people for a lifetime. With few exceptions, it ain't that special or exciting (even if they're hot, and give me a boner lol!)
bobevenson
Posts: 7349
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
Contact:

Re: the absurdity of the american voter, americans, america, etc. and etc.

Post by bobevenson »

Yeah, like you've ever had one.
User avatar
SpheresOfBalance
Posts: 5688
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 4:27 pm
Location: On a Star Dust Metamorphosis

Re: the absurdity of the american voter, americans, america, etc. and etc.

Post by SpheresOfBalance »

Dalek Prime wrote:
SpheresOfBalance wrote:
Terrapin Station wrote:The one picture was of someone with a Playboy magazine open in front of a toddler.

You must be ridiculously conservative on this stuff.
This is meant for everyone:

Was it photoshopped, or green screened? Was their a piece of blank white paper hiding the magazines content, or was a playboy cover fixed to the outside of a comic book? Then again playboy is not filled with x-rated pornography, rather r-rated nudity. In fact what child hasn't accidentally seen their mother, father, or siblings of another sex naked? Is nakedness detrimental to a child's psychological development? Are all families that visit nudist camps harming their children? Since the TRUTH of our existence is that we are our bodies, not our cloths, what actual harm can be done by seeing the truth of things? If you believe that nudity is harmful to anyone, then Freud was right about, at least your type; nut job!
There are so many things an infant can witness, that are clearly much healthier for them. Hey, you want to look at porn with your kids, by all means, you will. But of all the beautiful, picturesque books in this world, you choose Playboy? Get real, ya dirtbag.
You ignorant fuck, from the perspective of the camera, it can't be said that indeed those children were exposed to anything bad for them. You missed my point entirely, you are one dumb son of a bitch. Good thing you'll never procreate, because to pass on your genes would in fact be child abuse!!!
Dalek Prime
Posts: 4922
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:48 am
Location: Living in a tree with Polly.

Re: the absurdity of the american voter, americans, america, etc. and etc.

Post by Dalek Prime »

SpheresOfBalance wrote:
Dalek Prime wrote:
SpheresOfBalance wrote: This is meant for everyone:

Was it photoshopped, or green screened? Was their a piece of blank white paper hiding the magazines content, or was a playboy cover fixed to the outside of a comic book? Then again playboy is not filled with x-rated pornography, rather r-rated nudity. In fact what child hasn't accidentally seen their mother, father, or siblings of another sex naked? Is nakedness detrimental to a child's psychological development? Are all families that visit nudist camps harming their children? Since the TRUTH of our existence is that we are our bodies, not our cloths, what actual harm can be done by seeing the truth of things? If you believe that nudity is harmful to anyone, then Freud was right about, at least your type; nut job!
There are so many things an infant can witness, that are clearly much healthier for them. Hey, you want to look at porn with your kids, by all means, you will. But of all the beautiful, picturesque books in this world, you choose Playboy? Get real, ya dirtbag.
You ignorant fuck, from the perspective of the camera, it can't be said that indeed those children were exposed to anything bad for them. You missed my point entirely, you are one dumb son of a bitch. Good thing you'll never procreate, because to pass on your genes would in fact be child abuse!!!
The fact that you did procreate opens a new person to the real possibility of child abuse, you absolutely thick turd! No existence, no abuse. Procreation is child abuse! It breaks Kant's dictum to do no harm. ... And you missed my point entirely; there are so many good things in life you can introduce children to, that porn mags needn't be a priority!

Seriously, calm down and quit being such an arsehole. Fun aside, this forum is just an exercise in abusive behaviour. And yes, I'm guilty of it too, so I'm not holding myself up as an example of good behaviour. But at least I recognize it in myself.
Dalek Prime
Posts: 4922
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:48 am
Location: Living in a tree with Polly.

Re: the absurdity of the american voter, americans, america, etc. and etc.

Post by Dalek Prime »

bobevenson wrote:Yeah, like you've ever had one.
I've been told by a lesbian, even, how beautiful and pink my cock is. It actually gave her penis envy, and she wanted to play with it. Fairly acceptable confirmation of my manhood, if you ask me.
User avatar
Lacewing
Posts: 6604
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2015 2:25 am

Re: the absurdity of the american voter, americans, america, etc. and etc.

Post by Lacewing »

Why were you showing it to a lesbian?
User avatar
SpheresOfBalance
Posts: 5688
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 4:27 pm
Location: On a Star Dust Metamorphosis

Re: the absurdity of the american voter, americans, america, etc. and etc.

Post by SpheresOfBalance »

Dalek Prime wrote:
SpheresOfBalance wrote:
Dalek Prime wrote: There are so many things an infant can witness, that are clearly much healthier for them. Hey, you want to look at porn with your kids, by all means, you will. But of all the beautiful, picturesque books in this world, you choose Playboy? Get real, ya dirtbag.
You ignorant fuck, from the perspective of the camera, it can't be said that indeed those children were exposed to anything bad for them. You missed my point entirely, you are one dumb son of a bitch. Good thing you'll never procreate, because to pass on your genes would in fact be child abuse!!!
The fact that you did procreate opens a new person to the real possibility of child abuse, you absolutely thick turd! No existence, no abuse. Procreation is child abuse! It breaks Kant's dictum to do no harm. ... And you missed my point entirely; there are so many good things in life you can introduce children to, that porn mags needn't be a priority!
No, DP I fully understand what this latest point of yours is, (funny how it has mutated over time), and I agree fully. But you had no clue as to what mine was. People create things for display on the internet all the time that are meant to turn heads. They think it's extremely funny to yank someones chain. My first point was that while it "appears" that one adult allowed a child to smoke a cigarette, and that another adult allowed another child to view nudity found in a Playboy magazine, you can't know for certain that it's what was "actually" happening in those two photos, due to the potential trickery I cited. My second point was that nudity is natural, nothing to be ashamed of. One could surely make an argument for fetish pornography, but Playboy magazine has never had such photography contained within it's pages. Playboy is simply nude photography, historically actually considered the most respectable magazine of it's kind, as I believe it's no longer in print. The point wasn't that it was preferred exposure, rather that at the obvious age of the child in the photo, nudity was not something that would harm their development, as they wouldn't even understand what thy were looking at. Crap at that age, historically some mothers have bathed their infants while they bathed, as a further bonding experience. And for that matter I suckled, did you? It's called nature my friend, look it up, try "the birds and the bees." Sheesh, some peoples kids, thick they are, I tell you, thick!

Seriously, calm down and quit being such an arsehole. Fun aside, this forum is just an exercise in abusive behaviour. And yes, I'm guilty of it too, so I'm not holding myself up as an example of good behaviour. But at least I recognize it in myself.
Sure, I'm quick to treat people in kind, as with that measure, I enjoy it, as they surely deserve it!
You potentially slammed Bill and/or the creators of the photos needlessly, because you couldn't be sure that your knowledge was actually informed as to the truth contained in either the photos representations or the reason for their being posted.

Of course I still believe you crazy for your position of antinatalism. I mean just because you feel your birth was in error, doesn't mean someone else would feel the same way. Though as I've said, I do agree that we are creating way too many people, that overpopulation is indeed an problem.
Last edited by SpheresOfBalance on Tue Oct 11, 2016 9:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply