davidm wrote: ↑Thu Oct 19, 2017 4:42 am
ken wrote: ↑Thu Oct 19, 2017 4:32 am
davidm wrote: ↑Thu Oct 19, 2017 4:29 am
What are you babbling about now?
If just asking a clarifying question to you is drivel, then so be it. If you can not answer questions, then just carry on the way you are.
It's drivel because your question makes no sense. What are you actually asking?
Talk about being blinded by one's own beliefs and assumptions. The ACTUAL questions I am asking are the ones that I have ACTUALLY written down, obviously. The reason WHY you can NOT see them, which is also obvious by the way, is because you are looking at them from a presumptive perspective.
davidm wrote: ↑Thu Oct 19, 2017 4:42 amFact: evolution is observed to occur. Theory: the theory of evolution explains how and why it occurs, and allows scientists to make predictions and retrodictions. If it should happen that the predictions and retrodictions don't pan out, then the theory would have to be revised or discarded in favor of something that is more predictive or retrodictive. A theory is map of the territory, but not THE territory. Maps are often revised. So are theories.
]Fact: time dilation and length contraction are observed to occur. Theory: relativity.
Thought experiment: how long does a trip take over a distance of four light years traveling at the speed of light?
Note. The sun revolved around the earth and the earth is flat was, and still is, observed to occur. What is observed to occur is not necessarily actual fact. Also, why make a map of an assumed territory, and look at that map when, instead, you can just look at the territory directly and only, and then see the map as, and for,
what It IS?
davidm wrote: ↑Thu Oct 19, 2017 4:42 amIf you have a better theory to explain observed facts (muon decay, gravitational lensing, GPS devices, etc. etc. etc.) then spill it and you'll win the Nobel Prize in physics!
Again, another one concerned about prizes. What is it with you human beings and prizes? Are you that self-centred that what is of most concern to you is being recognized for some thing and being rewarded for thst?
Also, there is no rush. I reveal things when I am good and ready.
By the way, so called, "observed facts" are NOT always actual facts, and thus end up being obviously just distorted "facts". This distorting of the real and true facts has already been shown to occur that many times before that I wonder why human beings are still so sure of themselves, in what they observed. You would think they would have learned by now. Anyway, the reason of how and why human beings continue to distort the factual truth is obvious. It is just a shame that most are not yet open enough to seeing this.