Re: The Theory of Evolution - perfect?
Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2014 10:33 pm
True, but in the main these things supported the geological idea for an incredibly old Earth.Greylorn Ell wrote:The evolution of biological life forms is a fact, not a theory. The evidence is real. Dinosaur bones, trilobite fossils, even holes left by worms two or three billion years ago, all fairly well dated to times that we do not know much about because we were not on this planet back then. ...
Not so, the Theory of Evolution is the theory that purports to explain the above findings.Darwinism is the name of a theory purported to explain the fact of evolution. ...
It's not pseudo-science, like your Beon Theory, but just a scientific hypothesis in Biology that so far has proved its worth and has led to Biology now becoming an Engineering subject(apologies to the molecular biologists out there).Evolution is not debatable. However, Darwinism is the stupidest pseudo-scientific theory ever invented, even sillier than phlogiston theory or Aristotelian physics (which declared that heavier objects must fall faster than light objects).
No, its success was due to it allowing Biology to become more than a taxonomy.Darwinism's success is due only to its superiority over an even more absurd theory: the 6-day creationism promoted by Bible thumpers, led by nitwits like a Pope who thinks that heaven exists, and your dogs, cats, and pet hamsters will follow you there to be happy forever without you or them doing squat to earn it.
What 'evolution theories'?Evolution theories are a shitting contest, biggest turd vs. smelliest turd. Choosing between them is the job of turd connoisseurs. Which is better-- horse apples or cow pies?
Which major theories?My opinion reflects that of the dung beetle: Both of the major theories stink, so that I can easily find them, and roll them up into little shit-balls to feed my offspring.