Morals cannot exist without an absolute moral law giver. That law maker is God. If there is no God, then there are no laws, no rules to life, everything is relative subject to one's own personal world view that is always subject to change at anytime through the whim of a personal emotional desire. So to say there is no God is to say everything is just relative which means nothing is either wrong or right, good or bad, moral or immoral...However, when we add God into the equation, God being your higher conscience, evil would be considered ABSOLUTELY wrong. Because God is Love clearly by the fact that reality exists at all. Life is ultimately pure joy, love and beauty - anyone who fails to recognise that must be blind deaf and dumb.Science Fan wrote: ↑Sat Jun 10, 2017 12:20 am The first premise is false. Even without a God, it may be possible to establish objective morality; one would merely need to establish objective morals without any reference to a God.
So if there is no God then the ''human person'' is nothing more than a bunch of chemicals that have magically appeared out of total nothingness....even though life cannot possibly come from non-life...And so, if there is no absolute moral law giver... life has no meaning or purpose, we can so easily adopt an attitude that it is okay for a person to choose to be evil, simply because life is nothing, and death is all there is to look forward to, so I can basically do what ever I want ...nothing really matters anyway, it's my life, and I'm going to live it my way.
If we believed this to be true, then that would be our lot, people would invent their own personal world views...but then someone with an evil world view would not be compatible with the person whose world view is goodness, and if everything is just relative, then it would not matter which view you hold, it would be no one else's business denying you your world view because they would be just the in flavour of a particular desire.
If one person chooses to hold the position of saying something is morally wrong, then so too must the opposite be true in that someone else can disagree and say it's not morally wrong. As you can imagine,this is not the work of a rational conscientious moral mind.Humans beings simply cannot and do not in general live by that rule. That's because humans are in essence rational moral conscientious beings, made in the image of the moral law giver...they are unique expressions of the mind of God.
There is only One God operating through life. The other aspect of this One God is the body vehicle it chooses to express itself through, those bodies appear as the many... although it seems there are many bodies ..there is only One God in each of those bodies, it's the same One God in every body.
.