A Modal Angle to Existence of God

Is there a God? If so, what is She like?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Post Reply
User avatar
Necromancer
Posts: 405
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2015 12:30 am
Location: Metropolitan-Oslo, Norway, Europe
Contact:

A Modal Angle to Existence of God

Post by Necromancer »

Modal Logical Argument for the Existence of God - S5 Modality

UD (universe of discourse): Everything
G: Existence of God
H: Existence of Heaven
E: All Necessary Objective Ethics
M: Necessary Meaning
D: Necessary Definition of God (God is spirit)
C: Necessary Complete Knowledge - all the knowledge we can come to know, also when in Heaven

So,
1 C - Assumption
2 E - Assumption
3 M - Assumption
4 D - Assumption
5 C implies possible H/possible G - Assumption
6 E implies possible G - Assumption
7 M implies possible G - Assumption
8 D implies possible G - Assumption
0-------------------
9 C & E & M & D Conjunction introduction 1-4
10 possible G Implication elimination 2, 6
11 (C & E & M & D) implies possible G Implication introduction 9, 10
12 - (C & E & M & D) implies triple-possible G S5(1) 9,10 (◊◊◊) I guess my interpretation of S5 Modal logic in two steps
13 - triple-possible G implies Necessary Existence of God S5(2) (◊◊◊->□) I guess my interpretation of S5 Modal logic in two steps
0-------------------
14 Necessary Existence of God (□G, i.e., Necessary Existence of God)

God is proven! IMO!

S5 Modality: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S5_(modal_logic)
Modal logic: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modal_logic
Modal logic by Stanford University: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-modal/

I guess my interpretation of S5 Modal logic in two steps such that a possible, possible, possible entity becomes very possible entity becomes necessary entity.

Note: Atheists acknowledge in general that they can't disprove the existence of God.

That is, in simple words, that the necessary entities of Objective Ethics, Meaning, Definition of God and "Complete" Knowledge entails this special version of S5 modality so that these entities suggest a very possible Existence of God (and Heaven) and thus implies the necessary Existence of God (and Heaven).

(Introduction of "this" S5 is then given as example by a (triple-)possible company that operates by principles possible A, possible B and possible C and by these becomes a necessary company in this World, say Intel, Microsoft, Alphabet, Nike, Adidas, Asics, Sony or any other! My innovation?! :D )

Does this really work? Is God more proven by this? Less proven by this? It's all rubbish?

:D
thedoc
Posts: 6473
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 4:18 pm

Re: A Modal Angle to Existence of God

Post by thedoc »

Choice C.

Why try to prove the unprovable?
thedoc
Posts: 6473
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 4:18 pm

Re: A Modal Angle to Existence of God

Post by thedoc »

Each person will believe what they want, so why bother.
User avatar
Necromancer
Posts: 405
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2015 12:30 am
Location: Metropolitan-Oslo, Norway, Europe
Contact:

Re: A Modal Angle to Existence of God

Post by Necromancer »

thedoc wrote:Each person will believe what they want, so why bother.
Well, well, I hope to add to people's lives, to make their belief easier! :)
Post Reply