You were the one complaining about someone else's literacy (or lack thereof). I'm simply pointing out that if you are going to do that then you had better be certain that your English is perfect. Where did I quote you incorrectly? Oh, I see that you have gone back and made 'corrections' ('edited 2times') What a twit.Beauty wrote:I will not respond, if you quote me wrong! I don't have to.vegetariantaxidermy wrote:Clearly 'english' is not the same language as 'English'. And 'philosophy of religion' isn't an excuse to proselytise and god-bother.Beauty wrote:
Actually I chose to preach TRUTH. And Jesus did the same. And I am nowhere saying that the golden rule is not good to be followed. But hey, you have to be literate in english to be able to read english. Since you cannot even read as I clearly see, go and become literate first and then think of brainstorming on a philosophy forum, otherwise people like you only bother others on forums, and so people like us are bothered.
First, I could not be complaining about someone's illiteracy in writing, without being literate, therefore, you just showed me exactly what a dimwit you are.
Second, the 'philosophy of religion' section of this forrum - forum.philosophynow.org suits me just fine, and my dear for your so kind information, you forget that it is for me to choose where I go and where I don't, not for you to choose for me. Perhaps you can revise your rights once again and not come and interfere in mine?
BTW. You are not here to 'philosophise', you are here to 'proselytise'. There is a huge difference. In fact, they are opposites.