What I'm saying is that if you don't understand a paper, it's pointless to comment. It's like making some stupid remark about Einstein's General Theory of Relativity (and yes, "The Ouzo Prophecy" is in the same intellectual league, spiritual versus scientific).Lacewing wrote:And how does that matter? How does "knowing it" make you or your experience any better than anyone else's experience?bobevenson wrote:One can disagree with "The Ouzo Prophecy," but Ken and the rest of you don't have an inkling of what it's about, so you're all just shadow boxing.
This is incontrovertible proof that God is evil. God does not live by his own golden rule.
-
- Posts: 7349
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
- Contact:
Re: This is incontrovertible proof that God is evil. God does not live by his own golden rule.
Re: This is incontrovertible proof that God is evil. God does not live by his own golden rule.
So why is it pointless for you to comment about the foundational paper for your entire platform, yet you are willing to go on and on "lighting the lamps of truth even if all is for naught" to defend your own credibility? Why is your recognition more important (and more of the focus) than the message?bobevenson wrote:What I'm saying is that if you don't understand a paper, it's pointless to comment. It's like making some stupid remark about Einstein's General Theory of Relativity (and yes, "The Ouzo Prophecy" is in the same intellectual league, spiritual versus scientific).Lacewing wrote:And how does that matter? How does "knowing it" make you or your experience any better than anyone else's experience?bobevenson wrote:One can disagree with "The Ouzo Prophecy," but Ken and the rest of you don't have an inkling of what it's about, so you're all just shadow boxing.
-
- Posts: 7349
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
- Contact:
Re: This is incontrovertible proof that God is evil. God does not live by his own golden rule.
I understand the message, and the spokesman for the Spiritual Counterfeits Project understands the message, and as a divinely inspired prophet, I will just keep focusing on the message until the rest of the world understands it.Lacewing wrote:So why is it pointless for you to comment about the foundational paper for your entire platform, yet you are willing to go on and on "lighting the lights of spiritual truth even when it is all for naught" to defend your own credibility? Why is your recognition more important (and more of the focus) than the message?bobevenson wrote:What I'm saying is that if you don't understand a paper, it's pointless to comment. It's like making some stupid remark about Einstein's General Theory of Relativity (and yes, "The Ouzo Prophecy" is in the same intellectual league, spiritual versus scientific).Lacewing wrote: And how does that matter? How does "knowing it" make you or your experience any better than anyone else's experience?
-
- Posts: 4922
- Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:48 am
- Location: Living in a tree with Polly.
Re: This is incontrovertible proof that God is evil. God does not live by his own golden rule.
Whoa, Bob! Just focus on your own needs for now. One step at a time.bobevenson wrote:I understand the message, and the spokesman for the Spiritual Counterfeits Project understands the message, and as a divinely inspired prophet, I will just keep focusing on the message until the rest of the world understands it.Lacewing wrote:So why is it pointless for you to comment about the foundational paper for your entire platform, yet you are willing to go on and on "lighting the lights of spiritual truth even when it is all for naught" to defend your own credibility? Why is your recognition more important (and more of the focus) than the message?bobevenson wrote: What I'm saying is that if you don't understand a paper, it's pointless to comment. It's like making some stupid remark about Einstein's General Theory of Relativity (and yes, "The Ouzo Prophecy" is in the same intellectual league, spiritual versus scientific).
-
- Posts: 7349
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
- Contact:
Re: This is incontrovertible proof that God is evil. God does not live by his own golden rule.
Hey, like John on the isle of Patmos, I'm just the messenger.
Re: This is incontrovertible proof that God is evil. God does not live by his own golden rule.
By "messenger" do you mean "delivery boy" -- since you're not actually able or willing to comment on the paper, answer questions, or help people to understand it? You're not really helping spread the message at all then, right? You're just littering.bobevenson wrote:Hey, like John on the isle of Patmos, I'm just the messenger.
-
- Posts: 7349
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
- Contact:
Re: This is incontrovertible proof that God is evil. God does not live by his own golden rule.
I can answer any and all questions on the book of Revelation and "The Ouzo Prophecy." Christ's letters to the seven churches in Revelation are actually God's unified message to mankind, and if you add up the seven churches in English gematria simplex (A=1 to Z=26), which are the seven continents of the world from a spiritual standpoint, and subtract "the seven continents of the world" from a physical standpoint, you are left with the spiritual essence of "Robert Merlin Evenson." Now I ask you, are you afraid to check it out?
Re: This is incontrovertible proof that God is evil. God does not live by his own golden rule.
Then why haven't you? You just point to some regurgitated description that you've said over and over. That's not answering questions.bobevenson wrote:I can answer any and all questions on the book of Revelation and "The Ouzo Prophecy."
I already checked it out as much as I was willing to spend my time on it. There was nothing compelling, including your presentation of it.bobevenson wrote:Now I ask you, are you afraid to check it out?
Since you say you're willing to answer questions, here's one: What difference does it make whether anyone believes this stuff or not? Believing it hasn't resulted in anything significantly improved about your experience, has it?
-
- Posts: 7349
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
- Contact:
Re: This is incontrovertible proof that God is evil. God does not live by his own golden rule.
If you say you checked out the gematria of the seven churches, I surmise you agree with my findings, and if so, how do you explain how one could possibly gain this knowledge since it is quite problematic from a probability standpoint.
Re: This is incontrovertible proof that God is evil. God does not live by his own golden rule.
You didn't answer my question(s).bobevenson wrote:If you say you checked out the gematria of the seven churches, I surmise you agree with my findings, and if so, how do you explain how one could possibly gain this knowledge since it is quite problematic from a probability standpoint.
-
- Posts: 7349
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
- Contact:
Re: This is incontrovertible proof that God is evil. God does not live by his own golden rule.
Lacewing wrote:You didn't answer my question(s).bobevenson wrote:If you say you checked out the gematria of the seven churches, I surmise you agree with my findings, and if so, how do you explain how one could possibly gain this knowledge since it is quite problematic from a probability standpoint.
Please, what the fuck does that mean?I already checked it out as much as I was willing to spend my time on it.
Re: This is incontrovertible proof that God is evil. God does not live by his own golden rule.
Here are the questions you haven't answered:
lacewing wrote:Since you say you're willing to answer questions, here's one: What difference does it make whether anyone believes this stuff or not? Believing it hasn't resulted in anything significantly improved about your experience, has it?
-
- Posts: 7349
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
- Contact:
Re: This is incontrovertible proof that God is evil. God does not live by his own golden rule.
Jesus Christ, I'm more than happy to answer legitimate questions, but not that kind of bullshit!Lacewing wrote:Here are the questions you haven't answered: Since you say you're willing to answer questions, here's one: What difference does it make whether anyone believes this stuff or not? Believing it hasn't resulted in anything significantly improved about your experience, has it?
-
- Posts: 5621
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:39 am
Re: This is incontrovertible proof that God is evil. God does not live by his own golden rule.
What if your "Divine Guidance" instructs you to answer that question?bobevenson wrote:Jesus Christ, I'm more than happy to answer legitimate questions, but not that kind of bullshit!Lacewing wrote:Here are the questions you haven't answered: Since you say you're willing to answer questions, here's one: What difference does it make whether anyone believes this stuff or not? Believing it hasn't resulted in anything significantly improved about your experience, has it?
PhilX
Re: This is incontrovertible proof that God is evil. God does not live by his own golden rule.
It's not bullshit, Bob -- and you are being such a liar! That's why nobody believes anything you say... in addition to the fact that what you say has demonstrated no value to anyone, not even yourself. You've failed to deliver any kind of meaningful message to anyone, and when they question you as to why that is, you curse at them.bobevenson wrote:Jesus Christ, I'm more than happy to answer legitimate questions, but not that kind of bullshit!Lacewing wrote:Here are the questions you haven't answered: Since you say you're willing to answer questions, here's one: What difference does it make whether anyone believes this stuff or not? Believing it hasn't resulted in anything significantly improved about your experience, has it?
When you can demonstrate that your beliefs actually make you a better person -- the kind of person that someone else would want to be -- THEN there might be some incentive for listening to you. Until then, interacting with you is just for entertainment, because you've got nothing else "going on".