_______
(Continued from prior post)
seeds wrote:
When you use the word “completeness,” or when Dam uses the word “oneness,” I see them both as titles of a book, yet when I open the book, the pages are blank.
They are words used to evoke a sense of something profound being stated when, in fact, absolutely nothing is being stated (just smoke and mirrors).
Dontaskme wrote:
Actually there is a lot being stated about the nature of reality in all it's divine beauty and glory but you don't seem to be listening. You appear to have zero understanding of the concept ''Oneness'' and what it implies.
Allow me to paraphrase something I have posited in an alternate forum as it pertains to the concept of “quantum entanglement” and how it suggests an implicit state of
“Oneness” with respect to the universe.
The image below...
...is a depiction of the photographic film of a
laser hologram that is encoded with information that underpins the construction of a certain image of something (in this case, the image of three humans).
If you shine a laser into the film, a three-dimensional scene of the three humans will emerge from the patterns of information as seen below:
Now obviously (for the sake of this demonstration), we humans exist and interact at the level depicted in the second image.
It is a level of reality where separate appearing objects function under the mediation of the
speed of light (which is the defining feature that establishes the very meaning of what physicists call
“local” reality).
It represents the fixed and limited context in which most humans (especially physicists) base their assessments concerning the nature of reality itself.
The problem is that in the process of deciphering the workings of
“local” reality, humans have stumbled upon the fact that the very existence of local reality seems to be
founded upon a deeper domain (
“non-local” reality) in which the separation of objects and the speed of light have no meaning.
This is metaphorically represented by one of the quirky features of the hologram as explained below:
If you take the holographic film...
...and cut it into a dozen pieces and then shine a laser into each individual piece, the entire image of all three humans will appear in each piece (albeit less resolved).
What that seems to suggest is that the “architectural information” that goes into constructing the three-dimensional image appears to exist in a state of interpenetrating
“oneness” throughout the entire holographic (photographic) emulsion.
That would in turn imply a condition of “instantaneous interconnectedness” of the constituents that underpin the construction of the three humans in the image, which furthermore implies that their apparent separateness is, in truth, an
“illusion” (which, of course, it is).
Now according to certain interpretations of quantum mechanics, this holographic metaphor tentatively applies to the universe via “quantum entanglement.”
It suggests that all physical phenomena (galaxies, stars, planets, trees, our bodies, etc.) that appear to be separate from each other and separated by billions of light-years of distance within the context of
“local” reality are, in fact, instantaneously united to each other via the “entangled” patterns of information that underpin their construction.
In other words, everything we understand “objective” (material) reality to be is a holographic-like projection (emanation, explication) from a deeper (noumenal-like) level of
“Oneness” in which there is no separation of anything.
The point is that I have given a great deal of thought to the concept of “Oneness” in ways that you might not have explored.
Is that a possibility?
(For an interesting video on the possible holographic nature of the universe, then check out - "A Thin Sheet of Reality: The Universe as a Hologram" https://youtu.be/HnETCBOlzJs- presented by the World Science Festival, and featuring Leonard Susskind, Gerard t'Hooft, Herman Verlinde, and Raphael Bousso.)
(Continued in next post)
_______