Which would you prefer?
Re: Which would you prefer?
Hunting the elusive paper target seems to be beyond the mental grasp of most gun control advocates.
-
- Posts: 5621
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:39 am
Re: Which would you prefer?
If you don't like the program, change the channel.attofishpi wrote: ↑Mon Jul 17, 2017 2:40 pmMaybe thats both your paradise and heaven - having your balls segregated by a corrugated fence. You fucking idiot. (sometimes i think its wise to tell people how dumb they are)Philosophy Explorer wrote: ↑Mon Jul 17, 2017 12:59 pm Paradise on Earth or Heaven? I'm on the fence with this one.
PhilX
PhilX
Re: Which would you prefer?
Any person can be greedy and experience heaven for, and from the perspective of, them self and a select few only. But to Me Heaven would be the way of life where no person is abused and neglected, and when every one is, besides children and adults,Lacewing wrote: ↑Tue Jul 18, 2017 2:17 pmAre you experiencing Heaven, or is your heavenly life dependent on what other people right now are doing?ken wrote: ↑Tue Jul 18, 2017 10:57 am 'Heaven' is a way of life. Human beings can make hell for themselves, and live that way of life, which from an outside perspective is how life generally is seen at the moment, or human beings can make life much better for themselves and continue making it better and thus life and living far more heaven like.
treated equally.
No.Lacewing wrote: ↑Tue Jul 18, 2017 2:17 pmMust all be a certain way?Once ALL people are far more open and honest with each then a far more real and true "world" exists, where people can truly advance and progress towards that what they truly want, and far quicker than they are doing now. That true and real world, which ALL once wanted, is living in peace and harmony with one another.
I never said it was not.
In fact I am the one who says it is ALL naturally perfect. Always has been and always will be perfect as it is right, NOW.
I also could explain exactly WHY every thing is the way it is now and how as it is now is naturally perfect.
Of course not. 'Reality', just like every thing else, is relative to the observer.
Although there is only One True Reality, there could be just as many different perceived "realities" as there are sensory, experiencing and perceiving beings existing. The reality above could be as inaccurate as any other of the indiviually perceived "realities" are. There is only one way to know the One True Reality.
-
- Posts: 4257
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 6:09 am
Re: Which would you prefer?
Objective reality is indeed reality as it is while interpretations of it are subjective and therefore only partly true if at all
Re: Which would you prefer?
A subjective interpretation of objective reality could in fact actually match reality and thus be wholly and/or completely true also.surreptitious57 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 19, 2017 6:31 am
Objective reality is indeed reality as it is while interpretations of it are subjective and therefore only partly true if at all
Re: Which would you prefer?
Then why do you talk about it needing to change for all? Why does perfection need anything?
Re: Which would you prefer?
Paradise is on Earth, by definition. It may be mythical, but it was never anywhere except in the Tigris valley. All the inhabitants were flesh-and-sap or -blood or whatever; materially alive. In theory, the gods could plant another garden someplace else - east of Beijing, say, or west of Chicago - but if they have, it's not been written up yet.
Heaven is, by definition, up in the sky, the firmament, the wild blue yonder. Heaven is Yahweh's house of many mansion, and you can't go there until you shed your mortal body.
Since I'm not quite ready to die yet, I'd opt for the garden. Even if I had to shed my clothes.
Heaven is, by definition, up in the sky, the firmament, the wild blue yonder. Heaven is Yahweh's house of many mansion, and you can't go there until you shed your mortal body.
Since I'm not quite ready to die yet, I'd opt for the garden. Even if I had to shed my clothes.
Re: Which would you prefer?
I think that was the original idea, the original gardeners didn't know that they were naked, but doesn't that take all the fun out of it?
Re: Which would you prefer?
They were not there to have fun; they were there to be observed. Lab rats.
Once they discovered fun, they had to be discarded.
Once they discovered fun, they had to be discarded.