Opinion On 'Insanity' Psychoanalysis

[EvolveYourInsanity]

Evolution by Insanity
Can insanity without delusion, reasonably, rationally and/or in any understanding of the cognitive spectrum, be accepted by this (or a near) society, as simply a factor in human nature which exhibits/constructs/develops instinctual volition, emotions, intellect and other related behaviour?

What I'm more or less trying to get at, is insanity without delusion (moral insanity for other understandings) in my opinion and belief, is that it is nothing more than a small increased measurement in human adaptation/evolution as a species. The progression of humanity to a point where we've experienced (in some cases, as in this explanation) an exponential lack of interest, or in other interpretations, significant amounts of inhibitory, and lethargic disinterest, in certain things (mostly social concepts and ideals) now commonly defined as a form of mental disorder, a disability.

How can you declare a person's mind disabled or defected, when it has grown through life, and has attained such a perspective, that still exhibits interests to certain things relative to the persons own perspective from experience in life?

In an attempt to rationally and logically explain why psychoanalysis is broken and defected in itself, I will bring the basic notion that no two people in existence, during any single moment in time, absolutely will never exist in the same fabric of space, and therefore never contain a perspective in which it contains exactly the same experience as another.

That being said, how can societies be so naive when trying to be and follow each other in almost a monomaniacal sense? (Logically and truly, incapable of.) And then condemn the ones who have progressed enough mentally, to be in an "over-perceptive" state of mind, with instinctively exercised cognition, and an aptitude in understanding their mind enough to grasp/perceive their environment and self-awareness to a point which presents itself as mundane, unsatisfactory, recycled, and assertive by others.

Leaving them with an abundant stockpile of disinterest that appears to hinder development, but in truth, they're mental state is in a cognitive waiting room, observing the progression of those who force unnecessary interests for themselves as a distraction from what really instills fear and despair in their perspective, clinging onto a movement or common belief, that pursuing one way of following, yet advancing our predecessors examples, will reap benefits as their most desirable interests, in society.

But because those desires and interests aren't as appealing or self-sufficient to the "insane" persons' mentality, they simply relate it to a similar experience they've encountered previously, from reserved intellect, and decide it holds no value realistically to their mind's progress, due to an unchanged nature on their perspective. This is the cause, of such frequent and consistent lack of social interest, in one declared insane without delusion.

Not because they're oblivious or blissfully ignorant, but because their understanding, on how no two perspectives will ever be truly identical. It allows them to analyze, distinguish and verify when an event's (a single moment's) substance/contents, contain perception capable of enhancing their present perspective, or holds zero effect on present perspective simply based on the progress in cognition up to said present.

So, if you have a person with a very seasoned and developed perspective, obtained through seemingly countless experiences, interact with a person of a much less refined, perspective, obtained through hardly any life experiences, the person with the larger frame of mind, will naturally take little to nothing new or developmental into their already adequately growing (grown) perspective, due to the likelihood that the more nurtured perspective has perceived an experience similar enough to every, or nearly all aspects of the latter's inexperienced perspective. Instinctively taken into effect, those similarities will subsequently be considered insufficient amongst an already established shaping in the greater perspective, and be declared inconvenient and totally lack influence from absorption and integration into the former's collective perspective.

Reminder: Because no experiences perceived by any two people, in any space, at any time, can be truly and absolutely identical, it allows human nature to relate(connect), to all other perspectives of humanity, developing and molding them in one's perceptive and cognitive ability, to advance and better define one's unique and forever singular perspective in life.


Sorry some of the thoughts tend to stray towards rabbit holes, it's basically just one whole thought rambled over a handful of run-on sentences... lol so my bad for any grammatical flaws this philosophy may have, like I said it's basically just one big thought I typed out and haven't taken the time to draft it.