Philosophy Now Forum

Is there a point to that last post of yours, Hobbs? Except that you don't want to have sex with your grandmother? I've made my point, you are just too dull to see it. Perhaps a better name for my thread would be "Relations between the two sexes...", but not "sexual relations" as...

Is there a point to that last post of yours, Hobbs? Except that you don't want to have sex with your grandmother?

As for you Hobbes, the general differences between men and women are too important to be disregarded. I explain all that in my post, how even if you make men and women equal under the law, depending on what you make them equal in, you will benefit either men or women. I have to say, on one hand I am...

So is it because my OP is not logical that you could not point out a single flaw in it, be it logical or factual? If you actually read my post you would not be throwing around such idiotic and plainly false accusations as me being against meritocracy. You're way too delusional to argue with. The onl...

There are species where matriarchy is the superior way of organizing society, hyenas are an example. But not humans. Nah, you're off beam all round on this. These things change. Before technology the environment largely decided the status of women. In rich lands and those where vegetation was in mu...

Like I said, patriarchy is one of conditions for a sustainable high civilization but not the only one. Another is high average IQ of the population - something which the countries you mention lack. The West now still has the firepower to defeat Muslims, but it has that firepower BECAUSE of previous ...

Also, all other factors equal (ceteris paribus), a matriarchal (feminist, female dominated) system is inferior to a patriarchal system and the latter will conquer the former. Dreams. Patriarchal societies have already been profoundly out-competed by more egalitarian ones. The new alphas are not phy...

You obviously haven't read the OP. It's long and perhaps boring, can't blame you. But I do blame you that you try to argue without having read it. EDIT: I'll post here, as this thread is more appropriate for the topic of discussion http://forum.philosophynow.org/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=21494#p301194...

I have devised a nice way of dealing with gender - ignore it. People are people. Are they competent, reasonable and or interest? The rest is detail. https://ugc.kn3.net/i/origin/http://assets0.ordienetworks.com/images/GifGuide/clapping/citizen_cane.gif It would indeed be favorable for you Greta, at...

They should organise a protest outside the football ground chanting the Iranian equivalent of "let us in you fucking bastards". If that doesn't work, they could try going to watch cricket, instead. Men would have to be rather emasculated to let women protest without putting them in their ...

[youtube]8nSSIBQcMGA[/youtube] This video gets to the core of feminism, explaining its very origins. Feminism is just the consequence of women forgetting that the world, the human world of social constructs, isn't built on 'proper grammar', 'correct political opinions', or 'nice manners'. It is a co...

In this thread I'll explain why I think the current way many approach how the two human gender relate/compare to each other in society fails to adequately explain it, and I will propose my own explanation. Let's start with the obvious. All except the most insane of the feminists and MRAs will agree ...

I'm fine with sticking with that as your view. However, when you talk about using "objective" in a "goal" sense, and you say "this is what we mean," what "we" are you talking about? The philosophical sense of "objective" isn't the "goal" s...

TSBU Of course, there can be a bigger cat of a usually small subespecie, than a Maine cat. But ok, Objectively is, that the plan in your head has no contradictions. Ok, again, that's a common thought (the problem isn't in people heads usually, the problem is that the things in their head doesn't fi...

If yes, I would appreciate it if my username was changed to "Autsider". Thank you very much.