Philosophy Now Forum

All the religions are time dependent.With their proceeding history from time to time they vary in their causes and their effects(Needs). Let me take some universal truths. 1)Oxygen is essential for life. 2)At boiling point of some liquid ,you can't freeze that liquid at same temperature. 3)Until yo...

Your question is so simple: Here goes a short explanation We intend to believe that we are alive because we are not among dead. We are not dead because we live among living people. Now who can prove that dead are living and living are dead? I have already mentioned in a different post that we have ...

Only camparisons exist regarding our findings.We have nothing except comparisons whether that is knowledge or hunger for sattisfaction. All we know is actually our need or coincidence which we get from false images of experiences or what is told us. Look at the religions look at the ethics look at ...

In my opinion on the basis of religion's freedom one whoever favors such freedom wan an ethical criminal once..
Its up to men who never remained humans.
The oldest things in the living world of perception is "Humanity",save it at any cost.

The moral of the religions within the moral of humanity is the most horrible contradiction i ever notices
and for the sake of metaphysics
To agree with mean you don't have answers!

Delusion word never existed before religion or supernatural concept. Mind existed before religion or principles of religion. That's a phase of dark concept which should not be accessed on the basis of mind. If someone's mind generate idea of genocide how mind could be responsible as a whole? Its not...

In simple words i should have the summation of word "Ethics". Man's internal satisfaction to protect himself and community from the interference of overruling majority intrigues is known as Morality and Ethics. It varies from the boundary to boundary of humanistic thought's climax. No eter...

There is nothing called natural or supernatural. Atleast i have grounds to stand over my hypothesis. Let if there is something natural then why explanations for natural things exist? If there is something supernatural/mystic then true validity of assumption is that such things principles and frame o...

Religion via God or God via religion are relative.
No absolute definitions for proving relative validities.
Neglecting one will let other vanish
That's why
those who love,they need god to prove their unnatural hypothesis valid.
Still they need to prove thier moral less uncertainity.
Regard's.

Let ponder if there would be no religion? We hear no stories,no fears,no mysticism,no unanswered questions,no silences of hard turns of morality. The man who needed first these all aspects of thoughts was terribly important regarding logic of nothingness. Though i am not of opinion that map would b...