Philosophy Now Forum

chaz wyman wrote:

ShaSha1 wrote:

chaz wyman wrote:
I see. I suppose the next problem is to define what is and is not ethically good!
Most religions would claim that is what they have been doing for thousands of years.

The process of being ethically good or the attempt will always be leaded.

"leaded"?

Yes. Leaded by others

Man is a peculiar animal. He does not want to die, but he wants to have heaven. But it is true that heaven comes after death. That means if a man wants to taste heaven, firstly he must die. As a Drishtantoist, avoiding the matter of heaven I follow the principle: ‘Be good only for saving yourself an...

13:1) Know about slavery. 13:2) It has not been abolished. Masters have become institutions. 13:3) And you are under any institution. 13:4) Mind that, parents become glad when their son has gotten job. 13:5) Slaves have turned into service-holder. 13:6) Masters would sell their slave to another rich...

(1:1) He who desires to inform you about any imperceptible matter like God or Allah, you will demand listening fees to him before. If he disagrees, you will avoid him to save your valuable time. You can spend the time for the welfare of the people. (1:2) He who desires to tell any atheistic gossip, ...

chaz wyman wrote:
I see. I suppose the next problem is to define what is and is not ethically good!
Most religions would claim that is what they have been doing for thousands of years.

The process of being ethically good or the attempt will always be leaded.

The two principles of Drishtantoism are: 1. Neither theist nor atheist, but religious. http://shobujism.blogspot.com/2012/12/neither-theist-nor-atheist-but-religious.html 2. Be good only for saving yourself and the world. http://shobujism.blogspot.com/2012/12/be-good-only-for-saving-yourself-and.html

How is this a question? Depending on the sense I have commented you: The philosophy urges man to be good ethically. To me, if a man becomes so, he will express honest courage for saving himself. In this way, if all men save themselves ethically, the world will be saved from all the problems: religi...

chaz wyman wrote:

Felasco wrote:

Can you name one religion that has not resulted in causing stress hurt, shame, pain and suffering to others.

Can you name one human being that has not at some point caused stress, shame, pain and suffering to others?

Yes

A just question. So I am a drishtantoist.

Ironically, whoever thought up the idea of a spiritual world to explain our place in the natural world, this person or people were the original scientists, the ones with curiosity and a sense of wonder. Unfortunately that meme turned viral and became a destructive force in humans, creating havoc an...

Shobuj Taposh said, “ Though the world won’t be destroyed, man is not free ”. That is, man is not free in the undestroying world. It is a drishtantoistic concept related to the principle: “ Be good only for saving yourself and the world. ” In the concept the two propositions are compounded: ‘the wor...

chaz wyman wrote: I think you have failed to wake yourself up. You seems to be sleepwalking and talking nonsense.

I am trying to wake myself up in drishtantoist way. I hope in this way I will be able to wake myself up.

chaz wyman wrote:You are not making any sense.

I am failed to wake you up!

Worship + work = crops Work = crops. Therefore worship = 0 . The equation is made by Askay Kumar Dutt. Drishtantoism says that worship may be equal to 0. Love + marriage (Sex) = crops. Marriage (Sex) = crops. Therefore, love= 0 . The equation is made by Shobuj Taposh. Drishtantoism says that love ma...

So how does it differ from scientific existentialism? Drishtantoism is different from existentialism by its principle: 1. Neither theist nor atheist, but religious ; 2. Be good only for saving yourself and the world . Drishtantoism says for human unity. This unity depends on self-consciousness. Rea...

SO what is Drishtantoism? The essence of Drishtantoism is observed in the derivative meaning of the word, Drishtantobad. The philosophy advocates for the displayed and observed existence, or for the nature which is visible or observable. According to the philosophy, the thing which is materially ch...