Philosophy Now Forum

Russia is one of those barbaric countries that doesn't care about diplomacy, it's a rabid dog that only understands force and thinks it's entitled to create a Soviet Union 2. We're all barbaric countries if you look at the historical record. We need to move past the barbarism and try to negotiate p...

Might makes right, terrorist countries with nuclear arsenals can do whatever they want from now on. Russia will of course not stop with Ukraine either. The only option a country will have from now on, in order to remain free, is to create nuclear weapons themselves. Eventually the whole world will ...

Okay, then answer the question that IC ran away from. Explain to the Ukrainians why they should give up on the occupied parts of their country? Because the US cannot stop Russia from taking Ukraine if Russia becomes desperate. Did you see the video I linked to? According to Chomsky, Russia would pr...

Give Alaska to Putin, that should placate them for a while. OK. Wouldn't negotiating a less radical peaceful settlement be better/more realistic? Okay, then answer the question that IC ran away from. Explain to the Ukrainians why they should give up on the occupied parts of their country? Because t...

The political elite in the US horribly mishandled the Ukraine situation. They were warned by our own intelligence community that moving toward NATO membership to Ukraine would force Putin's hand. But they pushed for it anyway. So now what do we all do? Here's a relevant interview with Chomsky Give ...

The political elite in the US horribly mishandled the Ukraine situation. They were warned by our own intelligence community that moving toward NATO membership to Ukraine would force Putin's hand. But they pushed for it anyway. So now what do we all do?

Here's a relevant interview with Chomsky

now it's so much worse I must spread the message!! A critical examination of Tommy Robinson. It is really hard to define precisely what exactly the issue is (though I think Islam should be resisted strongly). Somehow, after seeing Atto's video of Tommy Robbins, I had the suspicion before watching y...

What are you assuming I assumed you meant? If society is going to call and label human beings from 16 to 18 years of age as 'young persons', then any human being younger than a so-called 'young person' could not rationally and logically be called 'a person', as to do so would be not just absurd but...

They’re demonizing more than half of the American people, Correction: ALMOST half the American people who voted in the presidential elections. The latest polls say it's much more than half. The latest showing in the Bronx would underline exactly how much of their core the Dems have actually lost to...

That is exactly what I thought you meant. Thank you for confirming it, however, that is NOT what *I* meant. As I stated in my reply ALL children are "young persons". All adults are not "young persons", but they are, nevertheless "persons". I made no claim that children...

Age, I am having issues with uploading here, with DropBox and with by Google Drive to link you to 3 JPGs. The 3 JPGs, are excerpts from the book Be Here Now. Pages #68, #69, and #70. The section is called "Appearance of the Witness". You can either PM me here and I will share with you my ...

How does one rationally and logically arrive at the definition of a 'young person' is 16-18 years of age? To do so would obviously imply that those younger than 16 are not even persons. Which is just beyond all sense of absurdity. Not necessarily, Age. A child is a young person IMO. All children ar...

"attofishpi" not just approves but even actually endorses and promotes the "british law" that adult human beings of any age are permitted to have sex with some children. To some this is very much endorsing 'pedophilia'. By "some children" do you mean young persons (chi...

Once more you have completely and utterly missed what I meant . So, I made it more clearer. Yet you are here promoting the permitting of you being allowed to have sex with some children no matter what age you live to. you already provided it Age, it doesn't sound to me like Atto endorses or is endo...

Also, you seem to keep forgetting that it is you who is here promoting and supporting "british law", which permits you to have sex with some children well past you are the age of 80. Er, Age - all children are younger than 80. Once more you have completely and utterly missed what I meant....