Philosophy Now Forum

Walker begins to lose whatever argument he’s having from his first post, but bless him, it can take a while for him to realise he’s run out of credibility. You can always tell if and when his penny has finally dropped, because he descends into obfuscatory incoherence … According to sworn testimony ...

Walker begins to lose whatever argument he’s having from his first post, but bless him, it can take a while for him to realise he’s run out of credibility. You can always tell when his penny has finally dropped, because he descends into enigmatic incoherence … According to sworn testimony ... Ain't ...

Humans are fucked anyway … Well, this might be true, but if it is, that isn’t for any of the reasons you believe (or pretend to believe). … so we might as well have a laugh on the way out- … Yawn—affected sardonic detachment is affected. When things have got so good … blah-di-bigotted-blah That’s t...

Yep—no other explanation.

… because you hate America and its freedoms.

You seem to have a problem with the Jews, Lorikeet.

Do you have in mind some, er … let’s say “ultimate” solution, by any chance?

Erudite gibberish is still just gibberish.

Just bigotry.

Now you look as if you are avoiding communication, Pete.

Erudite bigotry is still just bigotry.

Not emotionally charged enough.

Is that just your opinion or can you offer an argument and supporting evidence?

Pete, we are talking at cross purposes; I’m a philosopher, and it seems you are primarily interested in rhetoric. I happen to think your strategy is also weak from a propaganda point of view, but I am not skilled in rhetoric. Instead of “There never was any evidence of election fraud sufficient to o...

There is a difference between the qualified and unqualified versions of the "no fraud" claim, Pete, and it's crucial. Omitting the "nearly sufficient to change the outcome" qualification isn't summarising, it's traducing. Instead of generating a useful discussion of the evidence ...

You seem to have a problem with the Jews, Lorikeet. Do you have in mind some, er … let’s say “ultimate” solution, by any chance?

But that in itself is a lie, Peter!

As such, it muddies the waters in the interests of the MAGA people. I wouldn’t post it if I were you.