Philosophy Now Forum

Colonel Richard Kemp's long-standing support and advisory roles with Israeli defence strategies and connections with key Israeli political and military leaders, make him a highly partisan, hopelessly compromised commentator on the Israel-Hamas conflict. Aryeh Neier on the other hand … https://editio...

A fascinating and insightful examination of the “anti-woke” brigade: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03063968231164905?icid=int.sj-full-text.similar-articles.1 Anti-woke campaigners use platforms that also espouse the benefits of global warming and fossil fuel production, which the Intergov...

Here are some full sentences in the same room as mickthinks, and whadyakno!—they are right on topic here: How about making a distinction between acts of war and acts of terrorism? Gaza is capable of harbouring terrorists, of course (where isn't?) but it isn't capable of waging war. Israel's claim to...

Now kindly shove your partisan politics up your arse.

LOL NO U!11!

“What’s truly worrying here is not Douglas Murray being Douglas Murray. It’s the ease with which he and other far-right figures are ingratiating themselves with communities who have the most to fear from them: whether they be white supremacists decrying Hamas atrocities, or, well, other white suprem...

accelafine wrote: ↑Sun May 26, 2024 7:51 am … having tantrums when others don't play their little games …

lol project much?

lolwat?

This is a little bit racist; … (dont mention gold bullion or Prince Gabanji your uncle that just needs to unlock his bank account with a large deposit to make us all rich) I would call it an example of stereotyping, rather than racism, and stereotyping isn't always unjustified. That's not to say I ...

This is a little bit racist;

attofishpi wrote: ↑Sun May 19, 2024 2:13 pm … (dont mention gold bullion or Prince Gabanji your uncle that just needs to unlock his bank account with a large deposit to make us all rich)

Not always, no.

What’s worse than an ignorant bigot?
An arrogant ignorant bigot.

So what? So you have no idea what you are talking about. The same question may be asked with a diagonal which will be placed in the row number 2 for instance. Only if you have no idea what you are talking about. The diagonal is not placed in any row. The clue is in the name " diagonal '. All t...

There are an infinite number of ways to assemble the diagonal that establishes Cantor's thesis (though not if the proof is laid out using binary expressions). But there is only one diagonal. What you showed doesn't resemble Cantor's proof at all.

Welcome Emmanuel!

Don't mind attofishpi. He's our pet racist douchebag.

kouty wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2024 7:47 am ... why not to include diagonals

I think there is a lot you haven't understood. Why, for instance, are you referring to "diagonals" plural? There is only one diagonal in Cantor's proof.