Search found 319 matches
- Sat Mar 05, 2011 1:31 pm
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: Over Principia Mathematica by B. R. and A. N. W.
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2229
Re: Over Principia Mathematica by B. R. and A. N. W.
But it does so by the category... whether it's symbolic or a (proper) name.
- Fri Mar 04, 2011 9:28 pm
- Forum: About the Magazine
- Topic: issue 83
- Replies: 5
- Views: 13252
Re: issue 83
I'd like to add my "thank you" as well! Great service, indeed! Cheers!
- Fri Mar 04, 2011 4:01 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: Over Principia Mathematica by B. R. and A. N. W.
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2229
Over Principia Mathematica by B. R. and A. N. W.
Out of 'I know nothing and my set is empty! Can you call illusions knowledge? I don't think so! What is it to know? I have absolutely no idea! To "know" has been assigned to me! Thanks, Russell, for pointing out the danger of having a single proposition of knowledge!' TL (I think this quot...
- Thu Mar 03, 2011 1:29 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: Opinions on Physics - Puzzles, mysteries, that sort...
- Replies: 64
- Views: 30616
Re: Opinions on Physics - Puzzles, mysteries, that sort...
:roll: The Copenhagen Interpretation is indeed a set of (definite) requirements to the world of physics. I think you need to get sharper, you, mister or miss! :) [Edit, unsp.:] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copenhagen_interpretation ... :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrg...
- Wed Mar 02, 2011 3:35 pm
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: Opinions on Physics - Puzzles, mysteries, that sort...
- Replies: 64
- Views: 30616
Re: Opinions on Physics - Puzzles, mysteries, that sort...
You about that... Apart from that, it should be noted that Schrödinger's Cat is much cited in relation to Schrödinger's theory/theories, but I hereby encourage people to investigate this themselves. Schrödinger's Cat is also not necessarily hypothetical, it may be that they have done it, one version...
- Tue Mar 01, 2011 2:23 pm
- Forum: Book Club
- Topic: The Open Universe: An Argument for Indeterminism
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3106
Re: The Open Universe: An Argument for Indeterminism
I happen to agree to Popper, it seems. Thanks for the tip of the book!
- Tue Mar 01, 2011 2:07 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: Bending light by electro-magnetism!
- Replies: 24
- Views: 10052
Re: Bending light by electro-magnetism!
If you still think I'm wrong show me your reference for Earth's "magnetic gravity" field. Not it's magnetic field and not it's gravity because they're different things. 2 urls: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_magnetic_field You're one sloppy a**, ...
- Tue Mar 01, 2011 1:38 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: Bending light by electro-magnetism!
- Replies: 24
- Views: 10052
Re: Bending light by electro-magnetism!
I know you didn't see it in school because: there is no experiment that can demonstrate it; you've been unable to say what the experiment was; you have actually provided evidence that it can't be demonstrated experimentally. I know that magnetic fields exhibit a north and south pole. I'm not disput...
- Tue Mar 01, 2011 12:40 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: Bending light by electro-magnetism!
- Replies: 24
- Views: 10052
Re: Bending light by electro-magnetism!
Quantum effects have already been mentioned on the thread but you said you'd seen the bending of light with magnetism in a school experiment and you didn't. What do you know about what I've seen in school experiments? You don't know jack* about that! Cut the crap! However, that aside, where's your ...
- Tue Mar 01, 2011 12:16 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: Bending light by electro-magnetism!
- Replies: 24
- Views: 10052
Re: Bending light by electro-magnetism!
You should read the text!
- Mon Feb 28, 2011 10:08 pm
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: Bending light by electro-magnetism!
- Replies: 24
- Views: 10052
Re: Bending light by electro-magnetism!
My qualification is this: I have been reading Lee Smolin's "The Trouble With Physics" (by Penguin Group, 2006) and Roger Penrose's "The Road to Reality" (by Vintage Books, 2004). I have also studied physics all the way through upper high school, 3 years, for the Norwegian equival...
- Mon Feb 28, 2011 9:55 pm
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: Opinions on Physics - Puzzles, mysteries, that sort...
- Replies: 64
- Views: 30616
Re: Opinions on Physics - Puzzles, mysteries, that sort...
The earth's gravity does not have north and south poles. The earth's magnetic field has them. This is understood! And it is also my point that gravity of the Earth by its magnetic field can be redefined as either a combination of strong and weak interactions/forces or either of them. To say Earth's...
- Mon Feb 28, 2011 9:48 pm
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: Concerning the Graviton and the Higgs' Boson
- Replies: 13
- Views: 5758
Re: Concerning the Graviton and the Higgs' Boson
The earth's gravity does not have north and south poles. The earth's magnetic field has them. This is understood! And it is also my point that gravity of the Earth by its magnetic field can be redefined as either a combination of strong and weak interactions/forces or either of them. To say Earth's...
- Mon Feb 28, 2011 9:00 pm
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: what about Ether?
- Replies: 48
- Views: 18115
Re: what about Ether?
The earth's gravity does not have north and south poles. The earth's magnetic field has them. This is understood! And it is also my point that gravity of the Earth by its magnetic field can be redefined as either a combination of strong and weak interactions/forces or either of them. To say Earth's...
- Sun Feb 27, 2011 9:55 pm
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: Why we can not see the future?
- Replies: 37
- Views: 13184
Re: Why we can not see the future?
"Why we can (possibly) see the future?" By the projecting faculties of the mind in the mind AND not on the sky! Just the suggestion.