Philosophy Now Forum

The reason is in the OP. It would destroy the family. If it would destroy the family, there is a serious problem in the family. IOW they cannot possibly work this out. There is not enough love/foundation in the relationship to work through this event that will never recur. So, your description of t...

The ultimate true nature of reality is nothingness . ... the "ultimate" true nature of reality is conditioned upon a human-based empirical framework and system. Marry a perversion of an Eastern insight to a perverson of a Western insight, and use it for campaigning purposes. This is anyth...

It cannot be mystical because the "ultimate" true nature of reality is conditioned upon a human-based empirical framework and system. If it is empirically-based it cannot be mystical because it can be verified and justified within the human-based science FS or FSERC. None of which are lan...

This here is a prime example of 'beliefs', themselves. This one 'believes', 'without a shadow of doubt', what it is saying here. It, obviously, does not yet even know nor understand what I am actually talking about and referring to, exactly, yet it still believes, without a shadow of doubt, that I ...

The reason is in the OP. It would destroy the family. If it would destroy the family, there is a serious problem in the family. IOW they cannot possibly work this out. There is not enough love/foundation in the relationship to work through this event that will never recur. So, your description of t...

Age wrote: ↑Sun Jun 09, 2024 7:17 am Even if this one wanted to it could not be more Wrong and could not be spreading more Falsehoods here, which by the way I could prove True.

Liar. You could not possibly prove

This one thinks it can just keep judging and judging others, and never be wrong.

and it is false.

This one thinks it can just keep judging and judging others, and never be wrong. Age is making up a lie about me. I have admitted I was wrong in these forums. It happens in my private life offline. Age makes up lies about people that he cannot demonstrate are true. This is yet another of his endles...

phyllo wrote: ↑Sat Jun 08, 2024 1:13 pm All I can do is bring some focus to the discussion, show some contradictions and offer some improvements.

I have no control over how it will be received.

Yes, I understand.

The ultimate true nature of reality is nothingness. This is mystical claptrap. Your belief that there is an 'ultimate true nature of reality' is as irrational as belief in a god. More importantly it is language-based assertion....and what FSK is it conditioned on? And then, whatever this FSK is, it...

I would wager there's not a single person on this forum who has read more words, possibly written more words, on compatibilism than him. And yet I also bet almost everyone else on the forum could correct paraphrase the compatibilist position better than him. Well, when can manage to criticize an ar...

In the West, the philosopher has become a totally different phenomenon. Due to Greek influence, the philosopher lost his roots in existence and became more and more rational, became more and more speculative. And the Western philosophy has grown out of the Greek experiment, hence Western philosophy...

LuckyR wrote: ↑Sat Jun 08, 2024 7:18 am Instead of asking for more and more explanation, why don't you provide your own counterexamples to attempt to refute what you disagree with?

Because he thinks he has a special nature and is not bound by the expectations he has of others.

And, of course, I have addressed compatibilism in the thread in a number of ways. And compatibilism and morals in a number of ways earlier in the thread. Iambiguous tends to think that no one has done what he demands, when in fact they have. I spent a long time discussing how compatibilism didn't qu...

The ultimate true nature of reality is nothingness. Sunyata https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C5%9A%C5%ABnyat%C4%81 The realization of 'nothingness' can only be realized without 'language', i.e. via meditation, via deep reflection within which is the ultimate approach within philosophy. Therefore lang...

I don't think he's talking about free will. He seems to be talking about substance and the limits of physicalism to explain experiencing. The article does not mention free will, it is focused on substance issues. Maybe. Maybe?! LOL. See, Iambiguous has no interest in whether this is the case. The w...