Philosophy Now Forum

This reply here of yours is just more or less repeating the exact same thing/s you have said previously about 'objectivity'. I don't think there's anything more for me to say. If you do not want to repeat your own personal view here, or do not want to provide a link here, then okay. I provided a li...

Do other people's awareness distinguish between objective truths and subjective truths? Depends on what they have awareness of. But by my definition of the word "people", they do. My definition of the word people encompasses 'is sufficiently self-aware to distinguish between the objective...

I have no idea how this relates to what I said and pointed out here. In your post I saw that what I had said earlier in relation to Flashdangerpants was inaccurate. So I corrected myself. I quoted you because A) I saw this in your post, and B) Some of the things you said drew my attention to this i...

I have no idea how this relates to what I said and pointed out here. In your post I saw that what I had said earlier in relation to Flashdangerpants was inaccurate. So I corrected myself. I quoted you because A) I saw this in your post, and B) Some of the things you said drew my attention to this i...

Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon Feb 12, 2024 5:37 am Good luck to you

Thanks.

To Age, Skepdick, and Flashdangerpants It seems to me that Skepdick and I will not agree on the semantic of infinity. It seems to me that I don't really have anything else to say to Age. If you do not inform me of how you define the word 'semantic', then you will never become aware of if we are eve...

To Age, Skepdick, and Flashdangerpants It seems to me that Skepdick and I will not agree on the semantic of infinity. It seems to me that I don't really have anything else to say to Age. It seems to me that what I believe to be objective, Flashdangerpants believes to be not objective. It seems to me...

you missed or misunderstood the very first sentence in your quote of mine in this post of yours. Here now I will just suggest you read that first sentence at least one more time, and then see if doing so changes anything here for you. I read what you said again. And I looked at my reply to you. Bes...

Isn't it somewhat self-defeating that the "perfect" triangle you define as something that cannot be doubted is actually something that cannot exist? That it can't exist in our universe does not mean that it can't exist at all. The universe is not all there is to Existence. Or has someone ...

That's because infinity is not a number/destination. I'm sure I said that? So I'm guessing for you, if something goes on forever, you label/call it "infinite"? If that is the case, you need to account for the following: The only reason something can go on forever, is because of Infinity. ...

I'm well aware of non-euclidian geometry. Awareness and understanding are very different things. You seem to believe that non-Euclidean geometries are less perfect than Euclidean geometry. What you may call a non-euclidian triangle, I call an imperfect triangle. A perfect triangle has perfectly str...

OK. And? For the sake of argument lets suppose that it's irrational; or contradictory. Does that imply it's meaningless? Infinity is meaningful. Counting is meaningful. Counting to 10 is meaningful. Counting to infinity is contradictory/meaningless in the same way that a triangular square is contra...

Now, if you and another cannot agree upon and accept a definition for the word 'semantics', for example, then how could 'semantics', itself, be so-called 'necessarily objective'? Try and answer this, and see if while doing so helps you better understand what I was and am still actually 'meaning' he...

Regarding the new ontological argument I posted. Here is a link to the full work if anyone is interested. http://godisallthatmatters.com/2021/05/03/the-image-of-god-the-true-cogito/ Isn't it somewhat self-defeating that the "perfect" triangle you define as something that cannot be doubted...

Regarding the new ontological argument I posted. Here is a link to the full work if anyone is interested.

http://godisallthatmatters.com/2021/05/ ... ue-cogito/